View Single Post

  #3 (permalink)  
Old 25th-February-2007, 02:58 AM
joeyl Offline
Public Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: London
Posts: 101
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MichaelCorfman
Doing that is definitely a desire of mine, and of Casino City. We've actually spent a decent amount of time tracking down some issues, and what we have found is that it can be incredibly difficult sometimes, and the issues are not always as clear-cut as we thought they would be. Which means it needs an infrastructure and support beyond what we have in place right now to avoid falling on its face. My view is that this is a multi-step process. First step is to grow the number of affiliates working together, and so our near-term focus is on activities and programs we think will help that happen. IMHO, strength on that front is what will enable us to effectively expand into other areas over the longer term.

Michael
I would look forward to such infrastucture dealing with player issues.

I see 15 years of the industry pass and you've joined partnerships with PR stunts like Ecogra, not alot else. Which admittedly may do your cred good with the suits and the industry blowhards. Not on the ground where it matters though.

Maybe the GPWA/Casinocity can get the self proclaimed "players seal" & "online gaming's regulatory body - Ecogra" to define bonus abuse before another 5 years of operation and another million dollars + worth of players funds are confiscated under the guise of "breaking the spirit of the promotion".

I need not tell you the spirit behind all advertising/promo's are profit. Do the right thing with your lofty position in the industry and you'll get all you deserve for making a difference where it is needed. Buzz is not where it's at MC.

I watch your work carefully amongst others. I know the score from a players point of view. If I see you make an honest difference, i'll say so.
Reply With Quote