It's not about whether it happened, based on those screenshots, it did. I certainly imagine that if he couldn't care a jot about what people think, then there wouldn't be a denial neither.
So the guy is possibly not proud of the post and has hidden it. If that is the case, I very much doubt we will see a repeat of something like this.
All I am saying is leave things be. Two years is a long time in this industry. Things change and people have to change as well. I don't know if you have ever sat in on one of these performance reviews that take place in the corporate world but the message from the sages is clear, by all means judge on recent conduct but do not judge on things in the distant past.
Do a search for my profile at CAP and see my wonderful record of hardly any posts. I am not a disciple by any means but nor am I one to sit around when a two year old case is given air time.
This is merely an observation for my part by the way but I call it like I see it:
If someone takes a 2 year old thread and uses it, then I definitely see someone who wants revenge or a means to vent anger. I have not seen things happening at CAP recently (I may be wrong) that suggests Lou deserves this level of aggression so I again assume it's anger or revenge.
I also don't see why the GPWA has to enjoy the privilege of hosting a private war between 2 parties.
Now, that is not to say I condone the sale of database info. I also repeat, if Lou has stood in judgement of something someone said or did to him, then by all means stand up and tell him he himself doesn't have the moral high ground. Just don't turn each message board into a battle ground to achieve an end for vengence or anger.
|