Yuh, I suppose it's a matter of opinion.
A current issue emerged, very similar to this past incident though perpetrated by someone else. The past incident was resurrected to support the contention that database sales were at least tolerated, if not encouraged, by CAP.
That is the relevance to the present.
Beyond that, people, including me, were unaware of that past issue, and felt the urge to comment on it on its own merit, irrespective of the original purpose of using it to simply reinforce an observation of the possible tolerance of player database sales by CAP. That is why this thread appeared here (I think).
As such, either as a stand alone case or as evidence of a tendency, the issue has merit.
|