
30th-March-2005, 09:36 PM
|
 |
Private Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 1969
Posts: 2,049
Thanks: 0
Thanked 65 Times in 36 Posts
|
|
Antigua Anticipates Favorable Ruling on Trade Issue
Quote:
Press Release Source: World Poker Exchange
Antigua Anticipates Favorable Ruling on Trade Issue
Wednesday March 30, 7:54 pm ET
Small Nation Takes ``David'' Stance against US' ``Goliath''
ANTIGUA--(BUSINESS WIRE)--March 30, 2005--The small nation of Antigua and Barbuda could experience the proverbial "David versus Goliath scenario" come April 7th when the World Trade Organization's (WTO) trade ruling is announced. If the ruling goes as projected, it will be the first time a small country has defeated the United States in the world's increasingly important and respected international trade court.
If the original November 2004 WTO ruling is upheld, the US will face compliance issues requiring the US government to address in a reasoned fashion its approach to online gaming rather than simply prohibiting it altogether. "Most important will be the validation of Antiguan businesses' right to trade with the large US internet gaming market," explained Ron Maginley, spokesman for the Antigua Offshore Gaming Association, an industry trade group.
"This form of entertainment is widely recognized and accepted in many parts of the world--especially Europe," added Maginley. "Antigua is confident in the professionalism of its operators and asks only for fair and reasonable access to the immense United States domestic gambling market."
Antiguan officials anticipate that major US companies, including Citibank, Chase Manhattan, Bank of America, Clear Channel Communication, and Bravo TV, may soon find themselves required to comply with the WTO ruling legitimizing trade between Antiguan online gaming companies and the US market. In recent years, many American companies have turned away business from Antiguan gambling companies after receiving subpoenas or threats of prosecution from the US Justice Department and prosecutors such as New York Attorney General Elliot Spitzer.
Following the November 2004 announcement of Antigua's win before a WTO panel, the United States in January appealed the adverse ruling to the seven-member Appellate Body of the WTO. The hearing before the Appellate Body is seen by Antiguans as a "final hurdle in a lengthy and unprecedented legal battle," explained Mark Mendel, the lead legal counsel for Antigua in the dispute.
"Despite intense skepticism from virtually every quarter, our case is extremely strong and deceptively simple," added Mendel. "We have long been optimistic that the impartial dispute resolution machinery of the WTO would function as expected, justice will be served and potential compliance issues facing various US corporations and the US Department of Justice will be resolved in a manner which is favorable to fair and responsible international commerce."
The Antiguans have argued that it is inappropriate to treat businesses conducting transactions online as unequal to or somehow worse than traditional brick-and-mortar operations, or for the US government to assume lack of industry integrity without any objective evidence.
Previous speculation in the US media suggested that even if Antigua, one of the smallest members of the WTO, wins the case, it cannot impose meaningful trade sanctions against the US. However, Antigua remains quietly confident with the knowledge that the US will adhere to the WTO ruling with the same vigor that it has demanded of other countries when it has won similar WTO rulings.
Mendel predicted that a decision to uphold the original WTO ruling will ultimately result in US companies making accommodations to Antiguan gambling operators. "At the end of the day," said Mendel, "we expect major internet search engines, including Google and Yahoo, financial institutions and credit card service providers will have to do business with Antiguan internet gaming sites on the same basis as they do with US domestic gaming interests, including hundreds of American casinos, prolific state lotteries and many others."
|
|

30th-March-2005, 09:38 PM
|
 |
Private Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 1969
Posts: 2,049
Thanks: 0
Thanked 65 Times in 36 Posts
|
|
Quote:
|
Antiguan officials anticipate that major US companies, including Citibank, Chase Manhattan, Bank of America, Clear Channel Communication, and Bravo TV, may soon find themselves required to comply with the WTO ruling legitimizing trade between Antiguan online gaming companies and the US market.
|
How cool would that be after all the BS lately? 
|

30th-March-2005, 10:12 PM
|
 |
Asst. Manager
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,399
Thanks: 7
Thanked 30 Times in 22 Posts
|
|
Wouldn't it be nice?? To finally find out that peoples' money is their own to spend when they want?
But do you think DOJ will try to stop it?
__________________
Amateur
"...the universe has no edge and no center..."
"If you can't be a good example, you'll just have to be a horrible warning" - Jennifer Crusie
"Common Sense is not so common." - Voltaire
TheAPage.com
|

31st-March-2005, 12:08 AM
|
 |
Security/Membership Team
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 2,018
Thanks: 37
Thanked 94 Times in 80 Posts
|
|
I hope the US doesn't only follow WTO when it rules in it's favor... Or find some other loophole to satisfy the ruling without changing anything. Sometimes I wonder about our government here... I have very little faith in them doing the right thing when it isn't what they want.
THe CasinoCity lawsuit is stalled a bit, so we really need this!
|

31st-March-2005, 03:02 PM
|
 |
Security/Membership Team
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 4,958
Thanks: 2
Thanked 54 Times in 52 Posts
|
|
Quote:
|
"At the end of the day," said Mendel, "we expect major internet search engines, including Google and Yahoo, financial institutions and credit card service providers will have to do business with Antiguan internet gaming sites on the same basis as they do with US domestic gaming interests, including hundreds of American casinos, prolific state lotteries and many others."
|
Could this facilitate a return of PPC advertising targeting US players as a result?
|

31st-March-2005, 03:55 PM
|
|
Founder
|
|
Join Date: Dec 1969
Posts: 21,905
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
The US has been arrogant and presumptious in believing it could rule the internet with its pseudomoralism. Let's keep our fingers & toes crossed! 
|

31st-March-2005, 05:59 PM
|
 |
Private Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 159
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
To answer your PPC question. That is unlikely, but I hope I'm wrong.
|

31st-March-2005, 07:03 PM
|
 |
Security/Membership Team
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 4,958
Thanks: 2
Thanked 54 Times in 52 Posts
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by WebMeisterQ
To answer your PPC question. That is unlikely, but I hope I'm wrong.
|
Me too!
|

31st-March-2005, 08:51 PM
|
 |
Private Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 1969
Posts: 2,049
Thanks: 0
Thanked 65 Times in 36 Posts
|
|
Quote:
|
To answer your PPC question. That is unlikely, but I hope I'm wrong.
|
Actually, I think what they are saying is they will HAVE to allow the ads, or face some restraint of trade problems.
I think what's more likely is that the US will either ignore it, fight it, or find some other way not to comply. Sad, but probably true. We don't have much respect for people with different ideas than us.
Either way, it will help a lot in the long haul even if the US doesn't comply. It's another positive step to true regulation.
The more legit this business gets, the harder it will be for the US to prolong the enevitable reality that they can't, and SHOULDN'T win this one, and start introducing some bills so they can get their cut of the pie.
God knows, we're going to need the money at the rate we're going thru it these days! 
|

31st-March-2005, 10:01 PM
|
 |
Security/Membership Team
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 4,958
Thanks: 2
Thanked 54 Times in 52 Posts
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by TheCPA
God knows, we're going to need the money at the rate we're going thru it these days! 
|

|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:15 PM. |
Mark Forums Read |
View Forum Leaders
|
|