GaryTheScubaGuy

Originally Posted by GaryTheScubaGuy

thebookiesoffers is correct. 301's do pass LJ and nofollows to count...and I'll add that if you have a link to a page or not it will show up in the index.

Additionally, Google passes 99% of the link juice. I say this because I operate in gaming SEO and have tested and retested this a dozen times. When you rank top 10 for "Live Casino" or "bingo" and do a 301 and do not lose rank positions this means it transfers all trust and authority.

The exception

...

Originally Posted by GaryTheScubaGuy

Great thread!

Here's my checklist I give to my content people;

- Pick 5-keywords/keyword clusters (eg. casino, live casino, online casino, live casino online, live online casino dealer) The reason for this is that one of the few easily manipulated algo parameter is latent semantics, or in Layman's terms 'relativity'. A few mentions of a keyword doesn't cut it these days. I use the example that if I were writing about trucks(US) to a global audience I would includes

...

Originally Posted by GaryTheScubaGuy

Yes but then you are still subject to whatever juristication they are in. Then you have to litigate or sue, which would require a localized attorney. Travel to get wherever 'that' is, but that's only if you actually have a case. T's & C's are carefully calculated and aren't meant to protect you, most are meant to screw you.

I haven't seen ONE contract in 15 years as an affiliate ever point in favor of the Affiliate.

I was at the Bingo conference a few weeks back speaking

...

Originally Posted by GaryTheScubaGuy

Thanks to Todd at http://www.TheCanadianGambler.com for allowing me to post his site for the potential benefit of all of us being able to look at the site to actually see referenced the website...kudos Mate

Here are a few issues I found, but to be fair this is one of the best sites I've seen in a while.

1. There are 8 outbound links to affiliate sites (Brightshare, Alladins and Bet365) using 302's. I would change these to 301's and also add a nofollow.

Yes,

...

Originally Posted by GaryTheScubaGuy

Hi All, (and thanks to JaqiC for the public thank you!)

I wanted to add something to this thread before going on because based on PM's and posts I can see this is an issue for many. Plus I forgot to add the actual IP to the list of redirects.

On a side note Google can probably see and resolve many of these instances, but for me just like using keywords in the meta, if it doesn't hurt to do then I am doing it. (and by the way I have done considerable testing on both canonicals,

...

Tags: canonical redirects 301

Categories

‎ Uncategorized