End of my rope!

[universal4]

Dominique,

May I refer you to this thread (in case you missed it) as you may find it interesting that I had found one term in particular that was taken down to single result.

http://www.gpwa.org/forum/you-targeted-167710.html

And what's humorus is that the number one result for microgamingcasinos.htm is now that thread....

Rick
Universal4

[mojo]

Thanks Domonique for the helpful info. Google is trying. They removed several but now I look and there are 8 new ones when you search nodepositmojo on page one.

In the interim, while google struggles with this, I have put up a short blurb on the front pages of my sites recommending using a different search engine. I will make a full page explaining the situation and provide a link over the weekend. I also have a large gambling targeted mailing list I will send out to educate and post on our forum as well. Since there is not much we can do at this point, I am taking it to the people. Not that it will even put a dent in anything but if I take even one player from this (these) idiot(s) it will be a small victory.

Paula

[mojo]

Lol rick top spot, excellent!

I have written a page and put the link on my front pages. 2nd opinions are welcome.

Thanks,
Paula

[Dominique]

Good to see you again!

I have blacklisted 888 over this, and they have done considerable work to clean this up.

Currently I have blacklisted Cpays over it, and they did react by including the google guidelines in their SEO contest.

Our best bet IMO is to cut off the money supply to the spammers. They only spam because someone is paying them to do it.

But Mojo's idea of adding a page to our sites educating surfers about spam sites is also a good one.

We could easily link to one another's pages and just including some major sites in this will pull these pages way up in the SERPS. We saw this happen with the blacklisting of 888.

We really don't have to be helpless and hapless victims here, together we are considerably stronger than the Blackhatters.

We could dominate the keyword "blackhat SEO" etc. with educational pages about why this is bad. Someone looking to hire blackhats would see this first, maybe read and be influenced, maybe be influenced by the fact that the BH guys cannot dominate their own terms.

If we really wanted to, we could make a difference.

For those at GPWA who remember me, I guess I haven't changed much.

[mojo]

Thank you Dominique. We really have a fighting chance here. With your expertise, resources and ability to get folks together for a common goal I really feel we can knock them down. We don't have to rely on others and wait and wait for something to be done. We have our own weapons.

I will be glad to link with anyone who is interested. Let's rock!

Paula

[Dominique]

I have made a page, Mojo, and linked it to yours. Here:

http://www.gamesandcasino.com/blackh...ck-hat-seo.htm

Anyone else with pages explaining this problem, I will be happy to link to you also.

If enough of us do this and interlink, we will be able to rank nicely for these terms.

[mojo]

Thank you Dominique. I have linked you as well here.

http://nodepositmojo.com/alternative_search_engines.htm

I will link with anyone who would like to as well. I will also be adding other sites.

[greek39]

Here is a briefer from today. I only captured a few, time is precious right now.

xnoname.opole.pl/
x669.fetjewl.org
xcasino.roulette.pila.pl
xkjbsdu1.info/
xbelostermifa.info
xbctao.org/

I would suggest paying attention to the domain and not the sub domain. Block the IP range and not just a single IP.

For instance x669.fetjewl.org concentrate on fetjewl.org find the domain range and block. I would also suggest taking a gander at other sites to get an idea as to what is new and coming threw the pipe. Block them before they even have chance of getting set up.

greek39

[greek39]

Hey mojo I understand your fustration, we have all been through this. What I am going to do is take care of these three and then tell you what I did. As per the site reference letter I found it was partly true. Having a good hosting company who are up to speed with current issues is very helpful.

What the GPWA found out on similiar queries is true and accurate. I have found the same results.
In any case I found these today on google. Bare in mind the below are sub domains, the number in front represents the number of site the person has out there. Could be more or less. For instance if you typed in you address bar 1033cwtz.org/ a similiar would appear.

I will mainly concentrate on ip's or isp' and email addresses. Next Instead of submitting them to google as content theft, I will submitt as a spam result. In the comment box I will say a few things then end with saying jagger. Although I can't make any promises these should be gone within 24 hours.

1035.cwtz.org/
3556.ccidj.org/
105.djogcy.org/

Hang in there!

greek39

[mojo]

Hi greek,

I can't thank you enough for your post. I am researching what you are saying and I have a couple of questions.

When writing google, I should put the ip instead of the link like this
74.52.77.31
instead of
1035.cwtz.org/

or both?

I am having trouble finding the email address.

I will ALWAYS use jagger, thank you!

greek, your post explaining the most effective way to contact google is invaluable. Normally, the way I have been doing it, I only see results after 2 weeks and they are finally removed. Then 20 more show up.
If they remove it daily (or close enough), as soon as they show up again I will write them again and not give up. I know google is trying to come up with something. All of us reporting this constantly is key IMHO.

No one can keep up with the thousands of them but I can do my little corner. If we all do that, I imagine we can make a difference. Along with writing affiliate managers and making educational pages for surfers.

Sharing our knowledge with others creates an entire network of webmasters to at least TRY to stop this before all our stats crash.


Cheers!