GPWA
Welcome, Guest  [Log In -or- Join GPWA]
  Advanced Search

 

  #21 (permalink)  
Old 9th-April-2008, 11:51 PM
meccahost Offline
Public Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 8
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Greek39,

I'm more than happy to clarify the parts that you did not understand, if you'd please let me know what made no sense to you.

Bill
Reply With Quote

  #22 (permalink)  
Old 10th-April-2008, 12:18 AM
greek39 Offline
Private Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,333
Thanks: 269
Thanked 158 Times in 117 Posts
Thumbs down

Quote:
we take customer complaints very seriously, and I hope that we can have the opportunity to respond to this complaint.
Not in this instance, instead you felt the need to ignore a very serious complaint.

Quote:
I would like to point out that these special URLs -- that are used to help customers get listed on search engines
How does taking a well-established domain already ranking well and mangle it beyond recognition help? Such as xxxxxxxx..meccahosting.com/~a0002595/Seeburg_9800.html

Please tell me how this helps get people’s websites get listed on search engines. As far as I can tell the only really beneficiary is Mecca. It is complete and utter spamdexing.

Would this be the extent of you SEO knowledge? If so yikes!!!

BTW
Quote:
Cloaking

Cloaking refers to the practice of presenting different content or URLs to users and search engines. Serving up different results based on user agent may cause your site to be perceived as deceptive and removed from the Google index.

source:http://www.google.com/support/webmas...y?answer=66355
Mecca fair bit could still be said but I choose to leave it hear. I feel patronized and perhaps the person you should be dealing with is member mojo.

Good luck with Redhat, Zeus I prefer old school like pascal.


greek39
__________________
Quote:
He was a one-man galaxy of self-regard, and no one laments the crash of a career built on crushing the careers of better and more honourable men. For The National, I'm Rex Murphy.

Last edited by greek39; 10th-April-2008 at 01:11 AM. Reason: adding to post
Reply With Quote

  #23 (permalink)  
Old 10th-April-2008, 03:00 AM
Nandakishore's Avatar
Nandakishore Offline
Private Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: In Germany near Munich
Posts: 659
Thanks: 126
Thanked 82 Times in 63 Posts
Send a message via MSN to Nandakishore Send a message via Skype™ to Nandakishore
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by meccahost View Post
I'd like to say that we have to gear our services towards the majority; we would not be successful otherwise. I understand that this service did not work for Mojo, but it does work for over 90% of our customers
Please understand that it is not considered as ethical business to force a service on a customer without his knowledge. If you think you have to do it to gear your services, then, I am afraid, you are pushing yourself in the category of rogue business.

_______________________________

Nandakishore
Online Casino Newsroom
Facebook
APCW Interactive
Link exchange welcome. PM me.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Nandakishore For This Useful Post:
greek39 (10th-April-2008), mojo (10th-April-2008)

  #24 (permalink)  
Old 10th-April-2008, 07:21 AM
mojo's Avatar
mojo Offline
Private Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,740
Thanks: 228
Thanked 169 Times in 141 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by meccahost View Post
I'd like to say that we have to gear our services towards the majority; we would not be successful otherwise. I understand that this service did not work for Mojo, but it does work for over 90% of our customers, and we do receive a lot of positive feedback on this service. For people that are unable to obtain good search engine visibility on their own, we are driving free traffic to their sites that has been proven to generate sales.

The special URL that we use does require that links use "relative" addressing, and not a full path; we do try to help customers to understand the difference and change their pages to work under both. I'm not sure what happened in your case, as to why we didn't assist you with the conversion of your site.

We've found no evidence that any person looks closely at the URL; if you've found research to the contrary, we would certainly be interested in that information. The research we have shows that people searching on the Internet want fast access to information and spend little time assessing the source of that information; they click the link and briefly peruse the content to determine whether they feel it is relevant.

I can tell you that in the past 7 years, you are the first person to ever cancel an account because of these special URLs. We do receive a lot of questions from customers about them, but customers have rarely asked that we remove the listings.

In any case, I am very sorry about how things have turned out. We are certainly responsible for not working with you more closely to come to some sort of a compromise. We have modified customers sites on occasion to allow them to work with the "relative" addressing, but it would appear that we didn't offer this to you.

Sincerely,

William Howell
This is just wrong on so many levels. I did not ask your opinion on who looks at urls. I am a branded site, obviously people are going to search mojo. They see your url and think you are a scraper. All I asked you to do was host my sites. Period. You caused me many man hours and frustration because of your "service".

Why in the world would I want or need to change my pages to work with your method. This is absolutly insane. For you not to consider that I may have certain things on my sites that require my url is unexcusable. I don't care how much research there is. I go back to the same question I've asked several times. Why dont you ASK first before disrupting sites? You know that by doing this and a client doesnt want that, it ties up google. You KNOW this yet you do it anyway.

I ask you:

Why don't you give people the option? Would you consider adding an Opt In for this so called service? I have not heard the answer to this.

Meanwhile mecca hosting is a ROUGE hosting service.
Reply With Quote

  #25 (permalink)  
Old 10th-April-2008, 09:34 AM
meccahost Offline
Public Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 8
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

First, you're asking us to change the way we do things over 1 customer out of over 10,000 customers that doesn't like this service. Would you invest money in changing a system that works and that 10,862 customers have enjoyed, just because 1 person says they don't like the service? We are not forcing something on customers that they don't want.

All of our customers want to have better rankings in search engines to make more money, and we assist them with that. The majority of our customers cannot afford to pay for search engine promotion services, and know little or nothing to even try to get listed on their own. How is getting their site listed and making them money a bad thing?

We have not ignored this customer's very serious complaint; we addressed it immediately. We flagged the listing to no longer be parsed by search engines as soon as the issue was brought to our attention, without delay. Whether the customer liked this service or not, whether we should or should not do it by default, does not change the fact that the listing was already there, and that we did everything in our power to assist the customer to resolve the issue. If we owned Google, we certainly would have taken the listing down immediately, if that were within our power.

The site was "mangled" only for our special version of the site because http://zeus.meccahosting.com/~a000xxxx/ requires that links are "relative", which means that a link to /images/myimage.gif would need to be changed to images/myimage.gif. Generally, most links are created as relative by the web publishing software, but there are some that create absolute paths. If this type of problem occurs, we typically work with the customer to help them change the paths from absolute to relative pathing.

As far as an already well-ranked domain, our listing would only interfere if it obtains a higher ranking (which is not a bad thing; higher is always better), which in this case it was more highly-ranked than the customers listing. I'll explain why we get better search engine rankings a bit later. Since our listing took precedence (it did not remove their existing listing, it was only more highly ranked), the problem with the links being absolute and not relative was a big problem, and one that we should have worked closely with the customer on.

In regards to cloaking, this is something that has nothing to do with what we're talking about; however, I will briefly explain what cloaking is and why you can be blacklisted for doing it. The most search engine friendly page would be a type of page you would never want a human to see; it would have a lot of keyword redundancy, images would only exist further down the page, and the content of the page would not read well. What some people choose to do, referred to as cloaking, is that when they detect that the visitor is a robot and not a human, they decide to display a totally different web page; one that is tailored to the search engine, rather than humans.

Finally, I will briefly touch on search engine promotion to help you better understand why it is so hard, and why it costs so much money; in addition, it is my hope that you'll better understand why we're in a better position to help customers. The most important factor, as any SEO will tell you, is "popularity" which is applied to the root domain. This means that you have to have a lot of external sites pointing into your website to gain "popularity". How many links? Hundreds, Thousands, even Millions; the more the better, and the more you have the higher you will be ranked. In addition, the overall size of the website plays a major factor, as a large site is considered more credible. How many pages should you have? Well, generally, to be considered a credible site, at least 100 web pages, but more is better. There are certainly many other factors involved, but popularity and size play a large role, which make it very, very hard for small sites to rank well.

These special URLs rank well solely because they have the meccahosting.com domain; they would not rank well otherwise. Our website has almost 100,000 pages of content associated with it, which gives the domain credibility with all major search engine providers. We have tens of thousands of links into our sites, which are one-way links and not link exchanges (link exchanges are not highly valued by search engines). This gives all our customers an immediate boost and helps get them ranked and ranked well, without doing any work. Of course, if the customer wants to improve their listings even more, we suggest that they assess keyword usage and placement; keyword frequency and precedence are important as to what keywords they will be found under.

I won't respond further to this issue here. I will just say that we've been in business for over 7 years and have thousands of customers. You'll find our posts on forums all around the world where we openly share information, such as how to get listed on search engines, how to develop websites that sell, and other important topics. I hope that everyone would keep an open mind and look at our company, not from the perspective of just a single dissatisfied customer, but from the thousands of posts on the Internet to the contrary. I don't think you will find many other complaints on the Internet about Mecca Hosting; only a lot of "thank yous".

I'll only close with stating that search engine visibility is important, and everyone works to be found in search engines. We are assisting customers in getting ranked and they make money as a result, which we think is a very good thing. We also have over 10,000 customers that will tell you the same thing. Certainly, they would prefer to be listed under their own domain and not ours, but they understand the reasons, and getting listed and getting customers is what is important to them; not how it had to be accomplished.

Thank you all for listening.

Bill
Reply With Quote

  #26 (permalink)  
Old 10th-April-2008, 09:40 AM
mojo's Avatar
mojo Offline
Private Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,740
Thanks: 228
Thanked 169 Times in 141 Posts
Default

Quote:
First, you're asking us to change the way we do things over 1 customer out of over 10,000 customers that doesn't like this service. Would you invest money in changing a system that works and that 10,862 customers have enjoyed, just because 1 person says they don't like the service? We are not forcing something on customers that they don't want.
You could at least state this policy of CHANGING URLS WITHOUT PERMISSION on your home page. You don't even do that. Makes one wonder.

I am done here as well since we have hit a brick wall.
Reply With Quote

  #27 (permalink)  
Old 10th-April-2008, 10:59 AM
universal4's Avatar
universal4 Offline
Security/Membership Team
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Sinking Fast
Posts: 7,530
Thanks: 0
Thanked 109 Times in 93 Posts
Default

It really doesn't matter what "spin" Mecca wants to try and put on this.

Mecca, took a clients domain (which the client OWNS) that they were contracted to host and redirected traffic destined to that domain to a different destination.

PERIOD! It IS what happened....no marketing spin or quotes of we were trying to help the client or any other BS can change this or cover it up.

As a web host, they are charged with the responsibility of doing what a clients wants and contracts with them to do.

If a web host hosts domain1.com, then it is the RESPONSIBILITY of that web host to deliver any traffic destined for domain1.com TO domain1.com.... PERIOD!

I am also a member of a number of web hosting forums, although I haven't been active in a few of them lately, but NEVER have I heard of this kind of action by any host that claims to be so respectable, and certainly not one that has the kind of ewxtensive client list that Mecca does.

It is my sincere hope that this action gives Mecca a serious black eye, and that they either change their terms of service to make it more clear that they do this to clients traffic at their discretion, or that they become known for these practices, or that they CEASE these types of practices.

Many of us here are VERY well versed in the art of SEO, and we all know how much damage this kind of practice can do to rankings of a domain...

BUYER BEWARE!

Rick
Universal4
__________________
Casino Affiliate Programs
Hosting and Domain Names
Help with Slot Fever/Vegas Magic Winward Refer Bingo
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to universal4 For This Useful Post:
greek39 (10th-April-2008), mojo (10th-April-2008), Nandakishore (10th-April-2008)

  #28 (permalink)  
Old 10th-April-2008, 11:07 AM
greek39 Offline
Private Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,333
Thanks: 269
Thanked 158 Times in 117 Posts
Default

Bill,

The way you service your customers is entirely up to you. But I should mention in our highly competitive industry your method is classed as Blackhat Seo. In addition it makes a mockery out of the Google’s webmasters guidelines. Combine the two the method is toxic.

But being this the WEB, the Wild West, you are entitled to your opinion. Likewise we are entitled to ours. Webmasters must know about the pros, cons and implications hosting their sites with Mecca.

Google would be very interested in knowing how Mecca is manipulating their results. I am confident most here and on other public boards would appreciate knowing more about mecca.

Furthermore, I am confident most will not disagree with our position.

Thanks

greek39
__________________
Quote:
He was a one-man galaxy of self-regard, and no one laments the crash of a career built on crushing the careers of better and more honourable men. For The National, I'm Rex Murphy.
Reply With Quote

  #29 (permalink)  
Old 10th-April-2008, 11:26 AM
Nandakishore's Avatar
Nandakishore Offline
Private Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: In Germany near Munich
Posts: 659
Thanks: 126
Thanked 82 Times in 63 Posts
Send a message via MSN to Nandakishore Send a message via Skype™ to Nandakishore
Default

I think we should report this business practice of Mecca Hosting in any webhosting forum we can access.

_______________________________

Nandakishore
Online Casino Newsroom
Facebook
APCW Interactive
Link exchange welcome. PM me.
Reply With Quote

  #30 (permalink)  
Old 10th-April-2008, 11:31 AM
greek39 Offline
Private Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,333
Thanks: 269
Thanked 158 Times in 117 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nandakishore View Post
I think we should report this business practice of Mecca Hosting in any webhosting forum we can access.

_______________________________

Nandakishore
Online Casino Newsroom
Facebook
APCW Interactive
Link exchange welcome. PM me.
I agree or at least let others know. I figure the only reason they have 100,000 pages indexed is off the backs of others.

greek39
__________________
Quote:
He was a one-man galaxy of self-regard, and no one laments the crash of a career built on crushing the careers of better and more honourable men. For The National, I'm Rex Murphy.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
hosting

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:27 PM.
Mark Forums Read | View Forum Leaders

 Contact Us  |  Top