Thank you for the reply Universal.
My understanding of copyright issues like this is that, when something is developed under contract, it is what the copyright office terms a "work for hire".
Essentially what this means is that they copyright is shared equally between the person who contracted the job, and the person who did the creating. Either party has the right to sell the work, but only if they obtain prior approval from the person who shares the copyright with them, which did not happen in this instance.
I doubt very seriously that this person sold it either. I will advise him to ask, just to double check, but I say that because he would insist on his name and copyright credit being placed into the source code, and it is not there. Plus, the images simply do not fit the design of the site, and this guy would have made a version that fit correctly. It seems like a copy and paste of someone else's art file to me.
|