Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 33 of 33
  1. #21
    hcgroup's Avatar
    hcgroup is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    October 2017
    Posts
    284
    Thanks
    186
    Thanked 181 Times in 152 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by allaboutthebets View Post
    I've always thought a www. first always looks better too
    Hmm. But without www it is more practical. Right?


    Sent by using Tapatalk Pro

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to hcgroup For This Useful Post:

    vtyunby65 (13 January 2018)

  3. #22
    allaboutthebets is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    February 2017
    Posts
    134
    Thanks
    153
    Thanked 62 Times in 45 Posts

    Default

    Think Gary had tried to answer that above. I don't know or claim to know, I just think that personally it looks better. Not sure related to performance
    www.bettingappguide.com - latest betting app reviews & guides for Android, iOS & mobile. Free bets & daily free football & horse racing tips.

    www.androidbettingappguide.co.uk - Reviews, download guides & info for betting apps on Android devices

    www.bettingappsstore.com - Dedicated Android app store for all gambling apps

    www.bingoappguide.co.uk - Reviews & guides for all real money bingo apps

    www.pokerappguide.com - Latest reviews & guides for all the best real money poker apps

  4. #23
    Nik0 is offline Public Member
    Join Date
    January 2013
    Posts
    40
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 12 Times in 9 Posts

    Default

    It makes no difference for the performance. if you have already started the site without the www. better stick to it otherwise search engines may treat it as two different sites. If you launch a brand-new site I would suggest to go with www. from the very beginning, don't forget to add the rule in the .htaccess file. There is no special reason but you see the majority of sites stick to this standard so it's better to do it this way.

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to Nik0 For This Useful Post:

    hcgroup (12 January 2018)

  6. #24
    vtyunby65's Avatar
    vtyunby65 is online now Private Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    All over the place.
    Posts
    1,187
    Thanks
    3,956
    Thanked 992 Times in 614 Posts

    Default

    Hi mate,

    Yeah, I don't think that www prefix is really relevant. I wouldn't worry about it personally.

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to vtyunby65 For This Useful Post:

    hcgroup (12 January 2018)

  8. #25
    hcgroup's Avatar
    hcgroup is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    October 2017
    Posts
    284
    Thanks
    186
    Thanked 181 Times in 152 Posts

    Default

    Thanks a lot. Me, too.

    Cheers!

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to hcgroup For This Useful Post:

    vtyunby65 (12 January 2018)

  10. #26
    vtyunby65's Avatar
    vtyunby65 is online now Private Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    All over the place.
    Posts
    1,187
    Thanks
    3,956
    Thanked 992 Times in 614 Posts

    Default

    Anytime! You're welcome

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to vtyunby65 For This Useful Post:

    hcgroup (13 January 2018)

  12. #27
    GaryTheScubaGuy's Avatar
    GaryTheScubaGuy is offline SEO Moderator
    Join Date
    December 2008
    Location
    Malta
    Posts
    704
    Blog Entries
    22
    Thanks
    217
    Thanked 414 Times in 188 Posts

    Default

    Yes it does if you tested it. The reason for not redirecting to the www version is that many people do not use www in their backlinks, the WWW is the assumed format, the non-www is the dynamic handling of it. You will also have BOTH versions that you cannot control and you want the consolidate these to one page, not two.

    In the meantime I would run ScreamingFrog and make sure you don't have multiple versions of the index page. Ise this a lot when Webmasters get lazy.
    GaryTheScubaGuy

  13. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to GaryTheScubaGuy For This Useful Post:

    hcgroup (13 January 2018), vtyunby65 (13 January 2018)

  14. #28
    GaryTheScubaGuy's Avatar
    GaryTheScubaGuy is offline SEO Moderator
    Join Date
    December 2008
    Location
    Malta
    Posts
    704
    Blog Entries
    22
    Thanks
    217
    Thanked 414 Times in 188 Posts

    Default

    But at the end of the day; do the research and see what applies best; https://goo.gl/6yFNRE

    BTW - I thnk respondents need to back up their theories with WIKI or respected blog or best yet TESTING. Too much is being throu=wn around like its the gospel according to.....

    TEST
    GaryTheScubaGuy

  15. The Following User Says Thank You to GaryTheScubaGuy For This Useful Post:

    hcgroup (13 January 2018)

  16. #29
    hcgroup's Avatar
    hcgroup is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    October 2017
    Posts
    284
    Thanks
    186
    Thanked 181 Times in 152 Posts

    Default

    Completely agreed with you dear mate.

    Quote Originally Posted by GaryTheScubaGuy View Post
    But at the end of the day; do the research and see what applies best; https://goo.gl/6yFNRE

    BTW - I thnk respondents need to back up their theories with WIKI or respected blog or best yet TESTING. Too much is being throu=wn around like its the gospel according to.....

    TEST

  17. The Following User Says Thank You to hcgroup For This Useful Post:

    vtyunby65 (13 January 2018)

  18. #30
    GaryTheScubaGuy's Avatar
    GaryTheScubaGuy is offline SEO Moderator
    Join Date
    December 2008
    Location
    Malta
    Posts
    704
    Blog Entries
    22
    Thanks
    217
    Thanked 414 Times in 188 Posts

    Default

    Test it using htaccess at server-level and see ifs its significant to remain timelier that the www/non-www issue. All are redirects but happen two different places, or one less command.
    GaryTheScubaGuy

  19. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to GaryTheScubaGuy For This Useful Post:

    hcgroup (14 January 2018), vtyunby65 (14 January 2018)

  20. #31
    hcgroup's Avatar
    hcgroup is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    October 2017
    Posts
    284
    Thanks
    186
    Thanked 181 Times in 152 Posts

    Default

    It depends

    Quote Originally Posted by allaboutthebets View Post
    I've always thought a www. first always looks better too

  21. The Following User Says Thank You to hcgroup For This Useful Post:

    vtyunby65 (14 January 2018)

  22. #32
    hcgroup's Avatar
    hcgroup is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    October 2017
    Posts
    284
    Thanks
    186
    Thanked 181 Times in 152 Posts

    Default

    Sure. Thanks.

    Quote Originally Posted by GaryTheScubaGuy View Post
    Test it using htaccess at server-level and see ifs its significant to remain timelier that the www/non-www issue. All are redirects but happen two different places, or one less command.

  23. The Following User Says Thank You to hcgroup For This Useful Post:

    vtyunby65 (14 January 2018)

  24. #33
    GaryTheScubaGuy's Avatar
    GaryTheScubaGuy is offline SEO Moderator
    Join Date
    December 2008
    Location
    Malta
    Posts
    704
    Blog Entries
    22
    Thanks
    217
    Thanked 414 Times in 188 Posts

    Default

    without www before it the domain name, if its an exact match keyword, will bold...just like the description.
    GaryTheScubaGuy

  25. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to GaryTheScubaGuy For This Useful Post:

    hcgroup (14 January 2018), vtyunby65 (14 January 2018)

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •