
Originally Posted by
bettinganalyst
Thanks for your informative comment!
With regards to the tutorials they are designed for taking people from being a social gambler to the next level (make them think),we see no need to go into quads/algorithms has their appeal would be to a small minority and like you rightly point out, the ultimate professional can work it out for themselves! ,i think itīs fair to suggest,we are very aware that syndicates/betting funds do their own thing, we never suggested they would be reading any of our reviews,we just said that is our business !
For info - The sites focus (eventually) is to find a few good tipsters/info providers that we can use for our own betting fund and maybe open this fund/investment club to a wider audience (Thatīs why we have been auditing for the past 19 months) ,in the meantime, if we can cover some of the costs by raising revenue for advertising on the site, i guess we should take it! ps : We already receive plenty of information from third parties for our own betting purposes!
I think you are probably underestimating our knowledge of the betting/gaming business,we can certainly take the right partner (Broker-Fund) to an higher level,i see no point in being website 9999 with a Bet365 affiliate program, i see no point in pushing companies like Winners at the general public, itīs like cat food----------all the same!
With your suggestion that 850/1000 will leave a drop irrelevant of information, i totally agree, itīs probably 980/1000, you can lead a horse to water but you canīt make them drink it!
If your business is affiliates good for you itīs just not for us, we could turn our thoughts into the leisure play but why would we?