Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 28 of 28
  1. #21
    dhayman is offline Public Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    197
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 24 Times in 21 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jimcollins View Post
    Whenever we search with any casino keyword. We can find most results from affiliate sites than true casino sites. The searchers should get the more real sites than those affiliate sites. Don't you think Affiliates should be banned from casino industry? Don't you think affiliate sites are making the casino world a scrap? Are we viewers getting any benefit from affiliates?
    Are you with the affiliate police ??

  2. #22
    neanderthal's Avatar
    neanderthal is offline New Member
    Join Date
    January 2010
    Location
    SE Asia
    Posts
    4
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default We are better than them

    Funny to see this question here, but .....
    Simply affiliates are skilled more than casino operators.

    Quote Originally Posted by Jimcollins View Post
    Whenever we search with any casino keyword. We can find most results from affiliate sites than true casino sites. The searchers should get the more real sites than those affiliate sites. Don't you think Affiliates should be banned from casino industry? Don't you think affiliate sites are making the casino world a scrap? Are we viewers getting any benefit from affiliates?

  3. #23
    Caruso is offline Public Member
    Join Date
    August 2003
    Location
    England
    Posts
    884
    Thanks
    10
    Thanked 413 Times in 216 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by shortow View Post
    But that's just the nature of the internet - 10% gold 90% crap. Just have to deal with it and find the gold.
    Those percentages are way too close.

    0.02% / 99.98%.

  4. #24
    Nandakishore's Avatar
    Nandakishore is offline In Memorium, 1935-2014
    Join Date
    December 2006
    Location
    In Germany near Munich
    Posts
    2,104
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks
    931
    Thanked 496 Times in 367 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jimcollins View Post
    Whenever we search with any casino keyword. We can find most results from affiliate sites than true casino sites. The searchers should get the more real sites than those affiliate sites.
    If I use as keyword the title of any casino I will find in 9 cases out of 10 that casino at the top of the google list. It is, however, different if I use some general keyword like e.g. "no deposit bonus casinos". Then I cannot expect to get a list of casinos offering such a bonus, because many of them may not even highlight that term. Only affiliates can offer a choice of casinos offering such a bonus. That's the job of an affiliate. What's wrong about that?

  5. #25
    Renee's Avatar
    Renee is offline Sponsor Affiliate Program
    Join Date
    August 2005
    Posts
    9,071
    Blog Entries
    6
    Thanks
    6,642
    Thanked 3,539 Times in 2,205 Posts

    Default

    For the sake of noone actually reading my post, I want to ask some questions...

    I'm going to take the GIA and use it as an example.

    If I go to google and type in Gambling Industry Association, what should I expect to find?

    The GIA right?

    So what happens if someone is pushing for those keywords and just happens to be that the top 9 spots in my search are not what I'm looking for? Do you think that's right?

    Another example would be searching for the bonus streak forum or games and casino... you would expect that if you're searching for something in particular that the top result would be what you're looking for if that's the name of it.. right?
    __________________
    Renee, Affiliate Program Manager
    http://www.RewardsAffiliates.com
    Affiliate Program for CasinoRewards.com
    Best Affiliate Manager - CAP Awards 2008
    Best Casino Affiliate Manager - CAP Awards 2009
    Best Casino Affiliate Manager - iGB Affiliate Awards 2010

  6. #26
    RayUK's Avatar
    RayUK is offline In Memorian, 1964-2016
    Join Date
    January 2009
    Location
    England
    Posts
    322
    Thanks
    51
    Thanked 75 Times in 63 Posts

    Default

    But that is Google's job in terms of getting their algorithm right. The answer is not for Google to make a judgement on what is a casino brand that deserves to be in the index, and to remove all other lesser brands and all affiliate sites from that index.

    Well, it is up to them really if they want to - and they are tending towards that with their 'brand awareness' thing they are trying (IMO more to do with the more someone pays Google the higher up the SERPS you will be) but I think that is a mistake on their part, anyway onwards.

    If affiliate sites are using black hat techniques to get above the relevant casino brand in the SERPS then, by the definition of black hat (or even grey hat) Google is within their rights to de-index them.

    White hat techniques are white hat because they match (mostly) the kind of things that make a site user-friendly anyway. For an exact (brand) name match, as long as the casino brand knows the basics of how to make a good web site* I would be very surprised if they weren't on top or at the very least on the first page, so the surfer could scan the results and pick out what one they want. This is why a lot of sponsors disallow affiliates from using their brand name in domains or keyword targeting for adwords/PPC campaigns.

    When Googling I rarely find the site I want in the number one position, but it is on page one the vast majority of the time. Which is very good compared to say Altavista a few years ago!


    *This might be a big part of the problem?
    Ray
    Fun Bingo Online Facebook Twitter

    Tu ne cede malis sed contra audentior ito

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to RayUK For This Useful Post:

    Renee (13 January 2010)

  8. #27
    Renee's Avatar
    Renee is offline Sponsor Affiliate Program
    Join Date
    August 2005
    Posts
    9,071
    Blog Entries
    6
    Thanks
    6,642
    Thanked 3,539 Times in 2,205 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RayUK View Post
    But that is Google's job in terms of getting their algorithm right. The answer is not for Google to make a judgement on what is a casino brand that deserves to be in the index, and to remove all other lesser brands and all affiliate sites from that index.

    Well, it is up to them really if they want to - and they are tending towards that with their 'brand awareness' thing they are trying (IMO more to do with the more someone pays Google the higher up the SERPS you will be) but I think that is a mistake on their part, anyway onwards.

    If affiliate sites are using black hat techniques to get above the relevant casino brand in the SERPS then, by the definition of black hat (or even grey hat) Google is within their rights to de-index them.

    White hat techniques are white hat because they match (mostly) the kind of things that make a site user-friendly anyway. For an exact (brand) name match, as long as the casino brand knows the basics of how to make a good web site* I would be very surprised if they weren't on top or at the very least on the first page, so the surfer could scan the results and pick out what one they want. This is why a lot of sponsors disallow affiliates from using their brand name in domains or keyword targeting for adwords/PPC campaigns.

    When Googling I rarely find the site I want in the number one position, but it is on page one the vast majority of the time. Which is very good compared to say Altavista a few years ago!


    *This might be a big part of the problem?
    You know Ray I like you more and more every time I read one of your posts... Thanks for bringing such great arguments to the table without insults

    You're right, it's google's job. And the ones not relevant shouldn't be removed... I think there's a problem though when someone searches for something like "BMW Australia" and get a bunch of sites that are not BMW. I suppose thats when you need to revise your search terms, but there's not much else you can do with that one eh?

    I really do hate it though when I look for something by searching for the name and can't find it on the first page.. and believe me, it happens often..

    I was just curious as to what people thought of my comments...
    __________________
    Renee, Affiliate Program Manager
    http://www.RewardsAffiliates.com
    Affiliate Program for CasinoRewards.com
    Best Affiliate Manager - CAP Awards 2008
    Best Casino Affiliate Manager - CAP Awards 2009
    Best Casino Affiliate Manager - iGB Affiliate Awards 2010

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to Renee For This Useful Post:

    RayUK (13 January 2010)

  10. #28
    quicksilver's Avatar
    quicksilver is offline Non-sponsor Affiliate Program
    Join Date
    October 2009
    Posts
    21
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

    Default

    We do not have a problem with our casino affiliates.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •