Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 31 of 31
  1. #21
    TheGooner's Avatar
    TheGooner is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    March 2007
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    4,490
    Thanks
    2,069
    Thanked 4,467 Times in 2,133 Posts

    Default

    Appreciate the considered discussion / viewpoints guys.
    That's what makes the GPWA such a useful resource.

  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to TheGooner For This Useful Post:

    FictionNet (23 March 2017), The Buzz (23 March 2017)

  3. #22
    Muppet is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    December 2007
    Posts
    577
    Thanks
    166
    Thanked 661 Times in 290 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ozpoker View Post
    The Muppet is correct that there is little palate for this in the general community. Most simply don't care, and much like they people that voted on this in the Senate - they just don't understand. The only reason online poker is being reported as banned is that it is a better headline likely to reach more people than "online casinos banned".

    But to suggest this is more of the same and will have no effect is disastrously bad advice.

    Specifically all regulated sports, racing casino and poker operators in the major jurisdictions will be pressured to leave to maintain their existing licenses in those jurisdictions. That's a given.

    Additionally, the old IGA was targeted more at operators. The new reforms specifically contain provisions for affiliates, support centres, agents, associates and employees. On ascent of this bill it will be illegal for anyone to make or receive any commission or inducement to help facilitate or promote or advertise gambling operators that do not hold an Australian license. Of course it is impossible to obtain an Australian licence for anything other than sport, racing or lotto betting. And even Lottoland's licence looks set to be reviewed if not revoked.

    Affiliates are most definitely in the target sights. They will make an example of someone as the debate specifically raised the fact that no prosecutions have ever been laid in the IGA's 16 year existence. They will line someone up as proof they have the balls to follow through on the new laws.

    https://bettingsite.com.au/online-po...o-pass-senate/
    It is "more of the same" only it is now being enforced. It absolutely will and is having an effect, no-one is saying otherwise.

    Affiliates that have been targeting Australians with online poker or casino sites have been breaking the law since 2001. This is common knowledge, yet there are many Australian affiliates that do it anyway. They are fools and have only themselves to blame if they have to pack it in. Any affiliate running a site that does not predominantly target Australians has nothing to worry about. Again that hasn't changed.

  4. #23
    Ozpoker is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    March 2007
    Location
    Hong Kong
    Posts
    34
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 8 Times in 6 Posts

    Default

    There was some widespread support among the cross benches in the Senate to look in to a future review to advance a low limit regulated online poker market. But I suspect it will be years before they touch this again. If they did allow it, it would be in keeping with recommendations from the 2010 Productivity Commission report which suggest allowing small limit online tournament poker only.

    https://casinosites.com.au/iga-amend...e-poker-10430/

  5. #24
    Ozpoker is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    March 2007
    Location
    Hong Kong
    Posts
    34
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 8 Times in 6 Posts

    Default

    @Muppet

    Oh okay - then yes. If you're not providing or promoting online casinos to Australians, then no you should be fine.

    I guess it all depends how far they take it. Any affiliate whether Australian based or not who promotes casinos to Australian is committing the same offence, just less likely to be pursued.

    The wording is :
    "Enforcement action would be able to be taken against agents, affiliates, associates and employees who receive a direct payment, salary or commission for promoting, recruiting or supporting customers to bet with these illegal offshore gambling sites."

  6. #25
    Miles_Videoslots's Avatar
    Miles_Videoslots is offline Former Affiliate Manager
    Join Date
    January 2017
    Location
    Malta
    Posts
    386
    Thanks
    145
    Thanked 477 Times in 214 Posts

    Default

    Thanks Gooner ..That s what i was going to say i had heard that their are Pokie Machines in very corner and that was accepted can all of these be monitored and watched over are all of them legal in such a huge nation ? ..If Sports betting is acceptable and betting on Horses etc Ok then why should Online Gambling be such an Issue ? Do you not think the Government at some point will realise that there is Revenue to be made if they Add this area to there Taxation Polices and they will wise up not now maybe but done the road?


    Quote Originally Posted by TheGooner View Post
    The Australian public will not fight "tooth and nail" - online casino and poker is not established as part of the psyche compared to sports and horse betting. Australian's (and New Zealanders) have been subjected to a barrage of reports about online scams, online ripoffs, and people losing money .. they really is not much goodwill towards online casino evident.

    Australian legislators believe (rightly or wrongly) that they are already earning significant taxes through physical casinos and pokies ... and that the physical premises do a better job of preventing problem gambling than overseas companies.

    This is NOT a battle about gambling - that's an Aussie tradition - it's about what they call "short term" gambling that is deemed addictive and damaging without real world supervision.

    You might think that pokie machines in pubs and clubs are damaging too (I think you'd be right), but they have an established presence and have organised in a powerful and vocal lobby group to protect their existing patch ... while online groups just melted away.

    I don't see any sign of outrage on the streets of Sydney, Melbourne or Perth with this bill

  7. #26
    Muppet is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    December 2007
    Posts
    577
    Thanks
    166
    Thanked 661 Times in 290 Posts

    Default

    The vested interests that own the poker machines (conglomerates that also own Australia's 2 largest supermarket chains Coles and Woolworths) and sports betting operators etc don't want the competition. Team them up with the anti-gambling campaigners and you have a well connected group with deep pockets and wide reach that get what they want.

    There is also a large and vocal section of the community that despises the poker machines in pubs. Aside from seeing them as a mug's game (and to be fair they are because the payout rates are abysmal), the live music scene has died in many places due to pubs squeezing in as many as they can instead of less profitable uses of floor space. There is now the odd pub here and there that will promote themselves as a pokie free venue in order to attract customers, and there are regular newspaper stories with an anti poker machine slant. So they are pretty much on the nose both politically and publicly. It would take a very brave government to go against public opinion and vested interests on this so I doubt that this will change for a very long time if ever, though online poker has a better shot if it can convince people that it is in fact a game of skill.

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to Muppet For This Useful Post:

    Miles_Videoslots (24 March 2017)

  9. #27
    Parth84 is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    July 2011
    Posts
    170
    Thanks
    38
    Thanked 18 Times in 16 Posts

    Default

    Now most of the operators will have to leave the market. This is sad....

  10. #28
    Miles_Videoslots's Avatar
    Miles_Videoslots is offline Former Affiliate Manager
    Join Date
    January 2017
    Location
    Malta
    Posts
    386
    Thanks
    145
    Thanked 477 Times in 214 Posts

    Default

    @Gooner/Muppet I love it when you slap me correct lol your opinions as usual are always appreciated especially the ones where i get a swift kick up the backside and told off lol keep up the good work ..just my opinions is all
    Last edited by Miles_Videoslots; 28 March 2017 at 2:29 am.

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to Miles_Videoslots For This Useful Post:

    Muppet (27 March 2017)

  12. #29
    Ozpoker is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    March 2007
    Location
    Hong Kong
    Posts
    34
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 8 Times in 6 Posts

    Default

    Make no mistake this was all about Tabcorp pulling the strings in the background ....

    Desperately trying to protect market share for their declining tote product and hoping beyond reason that banning online poker & casinos would bring that money back to them. Not gunna happen ....

  13. #30
    Ozpoker is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    March 2007
    Location
    Hong Kong
    Posts
    34
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 8 Times in 6 Posts

    Default

    It has gone under the radar but the Australian Govt. jammed through the IGA this morning.

    There was expected to be wait while the online poker inquiry report is not due until late September.

    But before the inquiry reports back they have passed the bill.

    Online poker, online casinos, offshore sportsbooks - all banned within 30 days

    Only place that has reported it so far: https://bettingsite.com.au/senate-pa...poker-inquiry/

  14. The Following User Says Thank You to Ozpoker For This Useful Post:

    TheGooner (9 August 2017)

  15. #31
    bet-bg.com's Avatar
    bet-bg.com is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    August 2017
    Posts
    12
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

    Default

    Guys,

    Is it going to affect bet365 poker as well ?

    Regards,
    Ivan

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •