I must say that I can see Rick's point here. I have nothing against Bet365 and actually promote them quite extensively, however believe it or not I have still not met the 5 player threshold and everyone who knows me, knows that I probably wouldn't be considered a small affiliate as I have a network of 160 sites, been in the industry for 10 years ( 4 of which have been fulltime ) and run an office of 11 staff, so obviously make enough money to pay all their salaries, rent, domain renewals etc.
Granted I am no Super Affiliate but the point I am trying to make is that it is not necessarily just the small affiliates that cannot always get the players at a particular brand, I can't get players there despite some pretty decent exposure.
It would be a more friendlier term if the casino took into account the amount of exposure they are being given by a particular affiliate and the amount of effort the affiliate is doing when determining the number of players required before a payout.
I don't have a problem with the negative carry over as I believe when you are in a partnership it should work both ways - we shouldn't expect the casino to carry all the losses but thats a whole other debate![]()


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote

