Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    The Buzz's Avatar
    The Buzz is offline GPWA Gossip Hound
    Join Date
    February 2007
    Location
    Newton, MA
    Posts
    4,373
    Thanks
    437
    Thanked 1,974 Times in 1,226 Posts

    Default BetMGM hit with $3.2 million lawsuit for online casino glitch

    A Michigan resident is suing BetMGM for $3.2 million after her account was frozen and she was unable to withdraw her winnings from the company's online gaming app.

    According to the lawsuit, BetMGM only allowed Jacqueline Davis to cash out $100,000 before declaring that a game had malfunctioned and the remainder of her winnings would be null and void.

    BetMGM is a joint effort between MGM Resorts International and Entain (formerly GVC Holdings).

    From CardsChat:

    Davis successfully withdrew $100,000 of her winnings at the end of March when she visited MGM Grand Detroit in person, after playing the site’s “Luck o’ the Irish” game for five straight days in March. However, Davis then discovered that her account, which still contained roughly $3.18 million, had been frozen.

    According to a copy of the complaint obtained by PlayMichigan, BetMGM allegedly contacted her in April, asserting that the game had malfunctioned and that her earlier winnings were null and void.

    According to Fox 2 Detroit, which broke the story of Davis’s dispute with BetMGM, she deposited $50 on March 18, and her first wager on the St. Patrick’s Day-themed game was for $4.50. She repeatedly increased her wager after logging numerous large wins and was soon wagering $5,000 per bet, the maximum allowed in the game.

    Davis was up to more than $11 million at her highest point, but stopped after dropping to a little above $3.2 million. During the five days that she played the game, she gambled around-the-clock. “Who sleeps when they’re winning money?” she reportedly asked a Fox 2 Detroit writer.

    MGM Grand paid Davis her initial $100,000 withdrawal request, then later notified her that she wouldn’t receive the majority of her winnings. That led to her retaining a lawyer who stated that BetMGM offered Davis a one-sided settlement: She could keep the $100,000, but only if she signed a confidentiality agreement about the supposed glitch that occurred.
    Read more here: https://www.cardschat.com/news/michi...nnings-101757/

  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to The Buzz For This Useful Post:

    drifter8 (1 July 2021), Former Member 14 (30 June 2021)

  3. #2
    PROFRBcom's Avatar
    PROFRBcom is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    April 2013
    Posts
    2,169
    Thanks
    1,509
    Thanked 1,243 Times in 808 Posts

    Default

    This is why I laugh at all the champions of "regulated" and "legal" casinos and poker and sports betting because it is all so CLEAN! And players are so SAFE and PROTECTED from "shady offshore operators"!

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to PROFRBcom For This Useful Post:

    Former Member 14 (30 June 2021)

  5. #3
    Join Date
    November 2005
    Posts
    4,507
    Blog Entries
    1
    Thanks
    1,920
    Thanked 2,216 Times in 1,278 Posts

    Default

    Of course no problem with the lady losing 7.2Million @ $5,000 per spin.

    Quote Originally Posted by The Buzz View Post
    (formerly GVC Holdings)
    That pretty much sums up the outright theft, right there.
    Last edited by Former Member 14; 30 June 2021 at 6:09 am.

  6. #4
    Triple7 is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    January 2015
    Posts
    2,894
    Thanks
    2,069
    Thanked 2,473 Times in 1,342 Posts

    Default

    This is damaging the image of the gambling industry and supporting the view that many people have. If you're losing, everything is ok, but as soon as you're winning, the casino is trying to look for a reason to not pay. just like in the case between mister Green and Betfred.

  7. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Triple7 For This Useful Post:

    drifter8 (1 July 2021), Former Member 14 (30 June 2021)

  8. #5
    Pokerface's Avatar
    Pokerface is offline Public Member
    Join Date
    August 2016
    Posts
    2,987
    Blog Entries
    1
    Thanks
    597
    Thanked 962 Times in 708 Posts

    Default

    Crazy! Some of these casinos have very flexible rules depending on who is benefiting form the rules.
    statsdrone.com

    StatsDrone now offers Freemium plan to connect up to 30 programs - FREE!.

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to Pokerface For This Useful Post:

    Former Member 14 (30 June 2021)

  10. #6
    PROFRBcom's Avatar
    PROFRBcom is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    April 2013
    Posts
    2,169
    Thanks
    1,509
    Thanked 1,243 Times in 808 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Triple7 View Post
    This is damaging the image of the gambling industry and supporting the view that many people have. If you're losing, everything is ok, but as soon as you're winning, the casino is trying to look for a reason to not pay. just like in the case between mister Green and Betfred.
    Or the "edge sorting" scandal Phil Ivey was involved in where he had to give the money back after the casinos bent over backwards to accommodate his very specific requests (because they thought he would lose millions to them).

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •