Going back to the founding of modern conservatism in the 1950s and Senator Barry Goldwater’s 1964 presidential run, true conservatives have always believed in limited government principles – fiscally as well as socially. That is why leading conservatives, including former senator and current Poker Players Alliance Chairman Alfonse D’Amato (R-NY), former House Majority Leader and current FreedomWorks chairman Dick Armey, Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX) , George Will, Walter Williams, Grover Norquist, and Jacob Sullum publicly oppose efforts to prohibit online poker.
Conservatives have a good deal of momentum right now. If we do nothing from now until Election Day, the GOP could take at least one house of Congress. However, moves against online poker can only bring harm. While such moves may appease a dwindling handful of people who will vote Republican anyway, these moves would not earn the GOP one extra vote. On the other hand, moves against online poker would cost the party the votes of many poker players and enthusiasts, as well as the votes of those who believe in Internet freedom. Additionally, such actions would convince many Americans that the GOP was using limited government promises just to get elected, while planning on immediately reverting back to their pre-2006 ways once regaining control of either house of Congress. We all saw how unpopular that was with the electorate in November 2006 and again in November 2008.
Poker players are organized and energized. The Poker Players Alliance has over one million members, and they will vote for their liberty this November. One wonders how many votes the GOP is willing to give away in efforts to appease the rapidly shrinking big government wing of the party. The bigger question is, of course, how many votes true conservatives are willing to give away?