Yes I believe because some people have some guilt to play casino (bcs they have lost good amount of money and their close ones have told them not to play too much etc) and it makes them feel slightly better when the casino says "we are doing good for the planet" or sth
Although there may be a few, and that is a small few, most players will play with the ones that they feel they can win the most from. It's the wallet that counts more.
About A/B tests is really good idea tbh
I think gamblers would play on a casino that generates electricity from forest fires they lit themselves and sacrifices children to moloch if the player had an inkling that they had "better luck" on the one with the frog logo or whatever just because they hit their first good bonus on whatever game on it awhile back. All kidding aside I don't think it's possible to underestimate the pettiness of gamblers having been one myself.
Though the concept may be good to generate more organic shares and backlinks, as well as possibly within crypto communities it may have affiliation with, and the most important part can be first exposure so there may be some very niche traction to be gained from such a concept. Also, good press for online gambling for once wouldn't be a bad thing.
I think what Sherlock said just seems to be true. ESG is likely going to help players stick around longer.
Players with problems are escaping other problems.
I think it is very important