I am not expert here, so I just repeat what I read. I never had ETH, because I did not believe in the project, but obv I was wrong.
Ethereum has scaling issues. In a way worse than bitcoin. The network can be and currently up and there is congested (by the ICOs of ETH tokens). The price of gas is not being adjusted accordingly.
Also ETH is being too costly for smart contracts. I am probably writing it here wrong, but the effect will be roughly the same: ETH is using a programming language called Solidity and the devs can use this for making their projects on blockchain. Some parts of the code, when used on ETH blockchain, are paid by the ETH gas. The problem is that now making a customer account cost 10+ USD. So ETH has a problem to be used for its primary purpose.
ETH investors should maybe read this https://medium.com/startup-grind/i-w...m-804c9a906d36
But again. What counts is the money. I was wrong. I can be biased. This is hard to evaluate. After I saw I was wrong I realised that platforms like ETH can be interesting (although not as money) and bought another one that seems to have solutions for the ETH problems (already is POS, contracts are run on sidechains, programming language is dev friendly unlike Solidity). So it makes sense that I can not be fan of ETH.
Everything is very quick in cryptoworld. ETH for example is called generation2 blockchain, but there already exist generation3 blockchains, that are even more variable. I believe that BTC as universal money is locked by network effect. But I do not think the network effect for cryptocurrencies that are not being used as money is strong. If there is a bug in BTC, market must live with that and there is time to fix it. If there is some bug in other cryptos, devs can always switch to a newer and more advanced token.
If you talk to God, you are praying; If God talks to you, you have schizophrenia.