Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    joeyl's Avatar
    joeyl is offline Public Member
    Join Date
    November 2003
    Location
    London
    Posts
    480
    Blog Entries
    2
    Thanks
    43
    Thanked 142 Times in 92 Posts

    Default Gaming Affiliate Firm Closures

    KWBlue: Might want to keep a good record of what affiliate programmes close, under what cloud or not, or open again under new operatiion.

    It's getting a bit convoluted, and keeping up as a player is'nt easy.

    If you want players involved in your campaigns, you're going to have to set these complicated issues out for folk in a legible, user friendly manner.

    I can recall Sportingbet, Sunderlands and Grand Prive getting up to this and that, but as a player, I don't always understand the specific semantics involved..

    Cheers.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to joeyl For This Useful Post:

    kwblue (28 February 2010)

  3. #2
    universal4's Avatar
    universal4 is offline Forum Administrator
    Join Date
    July 2003
    Location
    Courage is being scared to death...and saddling up anyway. John Wayne
    Posts
    32,762
    Thanks
    4,050
    Thanked 8,863 Times in 5,667 Posts

    Default

    Good point.

    Rick
    Universal4
    Gambling World Online Roulette Online Blackjack Live Online Games Sports Betting Horse Racing
    Casino Affiliate Programs
    Hosting and Domain Names
    Gambling Industry Association
    GPWA Moderation by Me and My Big Bad Security Self
    If an affiliate program is not small affiliate friendly (especially small US Affiliate), then they are NOT Affiliate Friendly!

  4. #3
    casinobonusguy is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Posts
    2,390
    Thanks
    283
    Thanked 1,176 Times in 740 Posts

    Default

    Another reason why I am going to stick to my belief that I need to wait til a casino is in business a couple years before touching them.It is going to the point if a group is not listed on a stock exchange somewhere I will not be promoting them.
    I feel bad for the affiliate managers of these new programs because I am sure more savvy webmasters will be doing this soon.

  5. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to casinobonusguy For This Useful Post:

    AmCan (2 March 2010), TheGooner (28 February 2010)

  6. #4
    TheGooner's Avatar
    TheGooner is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    March 2007
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    4,481
    Thanks
    2,066
    Thanked 4,459 Times in 2,128 Posts

    Default

    Agreed CasinoBonusGuy

    It's been our policy from the start to not even look at ANY brand until they've been commercially operating for 12-24 months. And as you say I prefer to work with a simple clean financial set-up - public listed companies being best.

    The recent downturn and shakeout just reinforces that approach.

    I've had some funny phone discussions in the past with AMs who hear me say that and assume that it is just a bargaining position - they come back with what if we offer you xx% - or pay $xxxx up front ...


    It's almost shock and surprise when they finally realise that no matter what sweeteners are offered their program simply cannot buy a listing.

  7. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to TheGooner For This Useful Post:

    AmCan (2 March 2010), buddy (1 March 2010)

  8. #5
    SlotsAff is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    August 2007
    Posts
    810
    Thanks
    16
    Thanked 143 Times in 108 Posts

    Default

    As this industry progressives, affiliates are sensitive to how stable operators are - this in turn means a better service to the players they refer.

    Every affiliate can choose to promote who they like but with what has happened lately with Grand Prive and a few others, I can understand the need for more stability than ever.

    From an operators' point of view......these cowboy outfits damage all our reputations to some degree but the field is becoming smaller for the more serious operator (which can only be good to some extent).

  9. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to SlotsAff For This Useful Post:

    GamTrak (1 March 2010), kwblue (1 March 2010), Renee (1 March 2010)

  10. #6
    kwblue's Avatar
    kwblue is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    August 2005
    Posts
    832
    Thanks
    404
    Thanked 679 Times in 262 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by joeyl View Post
    KWBlue: Might want to keep a good record of what affiliate programmes close, under what cloud or not, or open again under new operatiion.

    It's getting a bit convoluted, and keeping up as a player is'nt easy.

    If you want players involved in your campaigns, you're going to have to set these complicated issues out for folk in a legible, user friendly manner.

    I can recall Sportingbet, Sunderlands and Grand Prive getting up to this and that, but as a player, I don't always understand the specific semantics involved..

    Cheers.

    We do have all of this information in our database, BTW, would just have to 'mine' it and bring it into the open. Our database works much like a database in the industry I am from (engineering and pharmaceutical): We do not kill/delete a record, all records are saved for complete audit-trailing.

    Getting to that data wouldn't be super-simple, because we archive the data to keep the structure more 'lean' for faster querying, but it is certainly possible.

  11. #7
    buddy is offline Public Member
    Join Date
    November 2009
    Location
    World wide
    Posts
    13
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default Same here

    I like a good % like everyone else - but tell me your track record and why it might work on one of my sites. I like true partnerships 100% -- Not getting my rev share or getting jerked around for months is not cool


    Quote Originally Posted by TheGooner View Post
    Agreed CasinoBonusGuy

    It's been our policy from the start to not even look at ANY brand until they've been commercially operating for 12-24 months. And as you say I prefer to work with a simple clean financial set-up - public listed companies being best.

    The recent downturn and shakeout just reinforces that approach.

    I've had some funny phone discussions in the past with AMs who hear me say that and assume that it is just a bargaining position - they come back with what if we offer you xx% - or pay $xxxx up front ...


    It's almost shock and surprise when they finally realise that no matter what sweeteners are offered their program simply cannot buy a listing.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •