GGPoker

[Jambo]

Definitely rumors. If players follow the rules, they have no problems. We have some very good winning players who won in 2020 more as 200k and nobody got banned.

[brilling]

The reason we have not decided to work for this group is that there seem to be too many rumors to ignore about winning poker players being banned from the GG Network.

Given that winning poker players play a lot, and rake a lot of money, those are some of the best clients to have as a poker affiliate. When they start getting banned that is terrible for profits and reputation.

Does anyone here at GPWA have any experience with GG banning your winning players?

This sounds like something people were talking about a couple of years ago, back when the network consisted of primarily manual accounts and other things along those lines. Networks & sites that have proper licensing can't exactly do whatever they want. Winning players are fine to keep winning, as long as the T&C's are not broken.

[kasinoilman]

Hi Guys, I'm new here. Is someone can share the contact with me would appreciate

[Jambo]

Hi Guys, I'm new here. Is someone can share the contact with me would appreciate

partners@ggpoker.com

[PROFRBcom]

OK, so lets say GG is legit and no longer kicking winning poker players off the platform.

What kind of percentage revenue share do they offer to established affiliates?

Also, after deposit withdrawal fees, admin fees, bonus deductions and all that shyte, what effective rate of advertised rate does an affiliate receive?

Feel free to PM

[Jambo]

I heard that many affiliate deals have been cut. GGPoker attaches great importance to a healthy balance between winning and losing players and if an affiliate cannot manage it and have low traffic, the deal is not so high.

What they don't really like are pure rakeback affiliates, and it is also forbidden to offer any rakeback deals or to promise players a fixed % of rakeback. Roughly speaking, only rake races are allowed to give something back to players.

The fees are ok. 4% with a deposit and who uses BTC only 1%. Withdraw is always 1%. That's actually fine in comparison with other affiliate programs.

PVI isn't that nice, but nothing else bad to say about it. From our point of view, GGPoker is great to promote nor can we complain about our deal
But affiliates who have mostly winning players who only take money out of the system and not so high traffic have a more difficult life.

[PROFRBcom]

But affiliates who have mostly winning players who only take money out of the system and not so high traffic have a more difficult life.

As it should be IMHO.

[fullbenefit]

Our High Stakes/Professional players have no problems, there was only one case though.
The player was using a chart and since GG takes screenshots of your screen - he, as well as many other regs (not our players) were caught.

You lose a lot of money because of PVI, but they will probably never get rid of it since that's their weird way of balancing the economy and keeping lots of money for themselves.
Too bad.

[Jambo]

You lose a lot of money because of PVI, but they will probably never get rid of it since that's their weird way of balancing the economy and keeping lots of money for themselves.
Too bad.

But to be fair, you have to say that they use this money also to finance all the rake races and network promotions.


Still, of course, PVI is not that great

[PROFRBcom]

You lose a lot of money because of PVI, but they will probably never get rid of it since that's their weird way of balancing the economy and keeping lots of money for themselves.
Too bad.

If PVI pays more for losing players, then it is not really a big deal because that volume can be made back by bringing in balanced traffic.

However, the PVI algo is likely a black box and there is no way to know...?

[Jambo]

PVI can change every day and is different at every limit the player is playing., nobody knows it. Sometimes a good player has 0,5 and when he is in a downswing and lose a big amount he maybe has 0,7.

[Vargoso]

I'm not against "indirect" formulas like PVI which in the end works good for the ecosystem. However, I recall from the original explanation of PVI (not available anymore on GGPoker's website) overlays were charged to it, so having affiliates paying for an overlay is not cool IMO.

We have had no issues with winning players at all. However, terms and conditions are strict, no charts - RTA - third-party tools - GTO, etc.

[Jambo]

overlays were charged to it, so having affiliates paying for an overlay is not cool IMO.

Yes that's true. I also don't understand why the affiliates have to pay for tournaments overlays.

[PROFRBcom]

Yes that's true. I also don't understand why the affiliates have to pay for tournaments overlays.

They do it because they can get away with it.

No other reason.