Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    theshortstack is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    August 2008
    Location
    London
    Posts
    142
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked 5 Times in 3 Posts

    Default Gross Revenue vs Net Revenue

    I've noticed a few programs are now offering payment on Gross Revenue. Can someone just point out the advantages and disadvantages of this kind of system and which one you generally prefer?

    Thanks a lot in advance!

  2. #2
    SlotsAff is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    August 2007
    Posts
    810
    Thanks
    16
    Thanked 143 Times in 108 Posts

    Default

    Well Gross Revenue deducts no bonuses, costs (such as marketing, processing costs, licensing etc) but %s are much lower.

    Net Revenue is a higher % typically but deduct all the above.

    You need to find out what costs are deducted in the net revenue commission formula to compare like for like

  3. #3
    jack-SA's Avatar
    jack-SA is offline Non-sponsor Affiliate Program
    Join Date
    October 2010
    Posts
    72
    Thanks
    21
    Thanked 41 Times in 25 Posts

    Default

    Let me briefly follow up on slotsaff on items most often deducted by affiliate programs that matter the most: player withdrawals.

    In short, compared to net rev. share, under gross rev. share you typically earn less, though being sort of 'insured' against withdrawals and chargebacks potentially made by your players, so your revenue can only grow.

    Example:
    gross r.s. ... a $100 deposit earns you say 20% of $100, by the time deposit hits player's account, i.e. $20
    net r.s. ... a $100 deposit (along with $40 withdrawal, 15% fees and no chargebacks) earns you ~40% of $100, i.e. $18

    But this can easily change with the amount of withdrawal being either $0, or $xxx -- you get the idea...
    Jack Jelinek
    Slotland Affiliates

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to jack-SA For This Useful Post:

    lots0 (16 July 2012)

  5. #4
    Louis - Income Access's Avatar
    Louis - Income Access is offline Sponsor Affiliate Program
    Join Date
    January 2007
    Posts
    679
    Thanks
    191
    Thanked 302 Times in 170 Posts

    Default

    I could see % on gross being a little more satisfying to affiliates because you likely get a clearer picture of what is going into the calc. On the other hand, I would expect your overall revenue potential to be lower because at the end of the day, margins for the operator are the same. If they pay you on gross, they are going to pay a % based on the assumption of certain costs that may or may not apply. When they pay you on net, they only deduct these costs when they actually apply, if that makes sense.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to Louis - Income Access For This Useful Post:

    smackness (16 July 2012)

  7. #5
    alex_sanches's Avatar
    alex_sanches is offline Public Member
    Join Date
    April 2012
    Posts
    29
    Thanks
    6
    Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts

    Default

    I use only net. revenue commission plan, it has more risk to lost some money than gross revenue, but still you will earn more, at least in my experience.

  8. #6
    Gabriel_LCP's Avatar
    Gabriel_LCP is offline Non-sponsor Affiliate Program
    Join Date
    August 2010
    Posts
    1,514
    Thanks
    156
    Thanked 303 Times in 248 Posts

    Default

    All of our affiliates are paid from their Net Revenues.

  9. #7
    the_soc's Avatar
    the_soc is offline Public Member
    Join Date
    December 2010
    Posts
    57
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 10 Times in 7 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SlotsAff View Post
    Well Gross Revenue deducts no bonuses, costs (such as marketing, processing costs, licensing etc) but %s are much lower.

    Net Revenue is a higher % typically but deduct all the above.

    You need to find out what costs are deducted in the net revenue commission formula to compare like for like
    what's unfair these days is that most bonuses are sticky (non withdrawable) - so their real cost, while not a flat $0 is pretty close to it since players can only withdraw what they win from the bonus... and if the casino's retention work is good, they'll keep the winner playing so he eventually loses back the money anyway...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •