Sorry for misunderstanding.
There is just quasi logic following the timeline of the story.
At v1 they came with the idea that only people who (i) have (ii) transacted the bitcoins during near past can claim the btc.
Then a lot of people were bitching about it ofc. At this point I stopped looking at it as well until yday
So they came with v2, which was an extension of the term and people got few more weeks to make the address active by sending money out.
So the "logic" was to give people time to activate their accounts, but it misses the original point, because everyone rational will do it and people just clog the BTC network. I do not think it was intentional, but it was the fee attack.
The flawed logic therefore is like if a corporation decides to reward the loyal customers who bought something during the last month. But it pissed off the other and even bigger customers. So the company changes the approach and lets everyone to be a loyal customer if they buy during xmas. But the flow of customers then causes a traffic jam.
If you talk to God, you are praying; If God talks to you, you have schizophrenia.