
Originally Posted by
joeyl
If the majority of the membership decide they too should be avoided, will the GPWA respect those future decisions. Will they be given opportunity to express their view about other possible rogues?
Rogueing and not doing business with a certain casino group for their actions is something I have been asking the GPWA to do for a long time, but was told taking action against rogues was not part of the GPWA remit.
If that is the case, it does'nt matter what "affiliates" say they are going to do, the GPWA will not be following suit.
If that is the case, while affiliates may not advertise the new casino, I take it the associated GPWA owner's sites such as Casinocity will be advertising the new Grand Prive casino.
Michael: This is a can of worms that has always needed opening, one I advocate opening, a drum which I and others have been banging, but have been ignored.