An interesting blog post by Steven Levitt, the author of Freakonomics and a blogger for the New York Times.
Apparently, there's a man in the running for the WSOP Ladies Event title.
Levitt's question at the end is the best part of the story ...
Full story here ... http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.co...ries-of-poker/So here is my question. Which is more embarrassing, (a) the World Series of Poker running a ladies tournament and having a man win it, or (b) actually being the man who wins the event?