Hello Frank and Henrik,
I checked your terms today. They are written in a professional way ... obviously by a lawyer and not by a greedy lateral entrant, who worked before as a grumpy ticket seller on a county fair.
Dear reader ...
Yes, there is no quota, because Rembrandt Affiliates don't want "
to ensure that affiliates who sign up with" a "
program" and
"promote" the "
brand to an adequate level." ... with force!
Surprised?
Not me!
This is a good example and a refreshing fragrance, that the "
The terms and conditions of the majority of the affiliate programmes are" not "
very similar".
Moreover, Rembrandt Affiliates don't need any backdoor rules for cold days. They don't "
reserves the right to reduce Affiliate commission percentages if the Affiliate reduces efforts to recruit new Acquired Customers"
No, I didn't found unethical things like that in their terms.
Serious business people are working on a high level. After I read the terms from Rembrandt Affiliates, it was clear to me the importance to decline excuses.
One example for a professional work:
This is a great and true example for "
terms [...] being in place to simply prevent fraudulent activities"
Resolving potential conflicts in the forefront that could arise in the future!
The minimum payout of earnings is only $150 (4.6), and you receive your earnings in the last week of the following month (4.7) ... A normal cycle is quickly reached.
Greetings from Germany
Leopold