Dear (MP),
I am writing to campaign against the legal limit for pub poker being £5 per person with a maximum pot of £100. In the UK we are allowed to spend £1000s on scratch cards, fruit machines, in betting shops or in online casinos or bingo rooms every day if we so wish, but we are not allowed to play pub poker for a reasonable amount of prize money and to a size and structure that all players are comfortable with.
Let poker players chose where, when and how much they wish to play for. Low Stakes Poker should be playable where players choose to play be it in a casino, a pub/bar/restaurant/club online or wherever the players wish to play. Players are sensible enough to decide for themselves what is and what is not a well run game.
Low Stakes Poker is a way of improving a players understanding and skills as well as being a social and entertaining way of spending time and making new friendships and associations. Therefore, I am campaigning for the legal limit in pubs to be raised to a sensible level and remove the max prize of £100 which effectively limits a pub game to 20 players at £5 stake, as well as allowing organizers to be able to make a small charge for organising well run games and providing equipment and staff to TD a game.
Most of all this is about choice, I firmly believe that people can decide for themselves what they are comfortable with and where they want to play. By increasing the stake limits in non casino environments and making games universally available the market will decide which games survive and which do not. For many casinos low stakes poker just is not financially viable and tournament structures are designed to push players to cash tables.
By allowing small stakes poker outside of casino's they would actually find that players would move onto the bigger games in casinos once they had learnt the game so this would benefit casinos. Low stakes poker also offers a place for Losing Online players to play live and see where they are going wrong - many online players are losing thousands secretly as they have no where to play.
The poker playing community is a large one, made up of people of both genders, all age groups, all social classes and ethnicity. It is a wonderful way to make friends and socialize, whilst learning a complex skill. Poker has the ability to bring people together who may never interact in any other social sphere - for non players it may have seedy connotations but in reality the community is made up almost entirely of welcoming, friendly people who simply want to do something interesting with their evenings. You can spend more on going to the cinema in London than you can spend on playing a friendly poker game. This seems completely ridiculous.
I hope you will take into account the views of a growing community - online poker is an industry worth between $1.5-2.5 billion every year worldwide - with a large proportion of players in the UK. Surely it is better to allow poker players to play in pubs and communities, supporting local businesses that may otherwise be struggling in the recession, rather than letting players spend undisclosed amounts online?
Please help us in our cause,
Yours Sincerely