I am a big affiliate and I have "employees", if it means fulltimers who get money on regulary basis independent on affiliate income. So yes.
Freelancing is a huge hype, I have never met anyone who can fulfill my needs. Even the last try: costly javascript guy who wanted 30USD/hour let me waiting for him for so long that I "fired him". Sadly whole this freelancing bubble went towards crazy ending. The platforms that deliver "freelancing jobs" - like Odesk - are corporations. What an irony. So there are kids who read something about digital nomads, but who are defacto employees of the corporation with minimal taxes and insurances and hiring a freelancer today means, that you are asking other corporation for insecured labourforce. It is incredible what happened during last years. It is in fact 0 hour contract, nothing else.
There indeed will be some skillfull guys there, but I never had luck and better strategy is to have longterm relationships with people based on trust and security. It maybe looks cool, to be "free@, but those IT guys are never 100% free. If they want to be really free and independent, they would work for themselves. But they are not able to be fully independent, therefore the game for independence makes no sense. 10-15 years ago, yes.
But that does not mean one has to follow classic way. E.g. it does not make sense to have an office, when really what matters in just head and laptop. People who work for/with me are on all continents and work can be done via group chats and emails. The only problem here is to find the people who are able to live such life, because yes, it is a different style of living when you actually can live the life of digital nomad with stable income.
Second thing is that indeed it does not make sense to do all the paperwork in IT/affiliate area. Company is just a shell and the people who are paid get the salary via ewallets or Bitcoins, so there is no paperwork with accounting and stuff like that. Also - if one really cares about the people - it is important they understand that they really live on their own. E.g. they will never get unemployment benefits if they quit, they will not get pension, if they do not invest, no employer is paying their health insurance.
In short - I see a way in "fulltime freelancers" or "independent employees". However this is not (yet) a model for big company with tens, hundreds or thousands of people. But honestly I have not seen many pure IT projects that would need so many people. Most internet projects are incredibly overstaffed, because it is hard to manage those projects. It diminishes the returns then.
Also - having independent worker - is different to freelancer, because those guys must respect your authority and commitment to the project, which is something very productive. Freelancers have often the feeling/approach: "I will do my hours, you pay me and ****off". But coding something is about debug mostly and the debug has to be deep and ongoing. Someone who works only with you can and should spot his mistakes as he develops further projects. Freelancer makes the job and is gone. You can do the debug, then find someone else to repair it etc. It is incredible loss of efectivity. There are so many bugs. Always. Even at simplest websites. Even at biggest corporations. If you did not see any bugs at your website or you trust to your freelancer... well... do not be surprised.
Last note: the good worker is someone extremely rare. Because he is good and because he is good because you invested into him a lot. So it makes sense to try from every one to make a partner for life. It will fail most times and it is a slow process, but in the end it seems - at least for me - that doing it this way was my best investment ever, because now I can write here this article and I know the things that need to be done are in progress.
If you talk to God, you are praying; If God talks to you, you have schizophrenia.