What type of content is more interesting to you: when an expert shares his personal l

[kkraljjjsimon]

I'm still looking for my vision for the introduction of social networks like Medium. I mean for publishing articles. Because for work, I write purely on professional gambling topics. Are you interested in reading reflections or articles that are close to gambling topics but with personal aspects?

[universal4]

Simple answer is no.

One personal pet peeve is that most writers that claim they are experts, usually are not. And those that are, or at least know one specific topic very well, usually will not claim to be an expert but will show how much they understand a topic in their writing.

I know a lot of folks here at the GPWA that would mot likely be considered an expert in some areas of expertise, but don't think a single one will claim to be an expert. Sure they might mention how long they have been doing something, or writing about or consulting on a topic, but hey prove their knowledge in their writing, but not by their claims.

And don't get too technical. If an article is about the tech aspects of a game, then it should be studied and presented, but if you are explaining how a game is fun as an example, discussing the tech aspects of it just threw fun out the window.

And don't try to use too many words. If a writer has to add an extra 200-400-800 words to show expertise then they might have missed the point. The more "expert" articles will often make their point in few words and easier to read articles.

Rick
Universal4