Results 1 to 14 of 14
  1. #1
    Malikbhai is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    September 2017
    Posts
    758
    Thanks
    204
    Thanked 376 Times in 245 Posts

    Default Wire Act applies to all online gambling

    The US Department of Justice has reversed its previous opinion that the Wire Act applied only to sports betting, setting up a showdown with the states that have launched intrastate online gambling markets.

    They haven't prosecuted US based businesses engaged in technology or affiliations so far.

    Land based casino owners are behind this lobbying effort. This is my guess.

    https://calvinayre.com/2019/01/15/bu...line-gambling/

  2. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Malikbhai For This Useful Post:

    allaboutthebets (17 January 2019), FictionNet (15 January 2019), Mario The Gambler (16 January 2019)

  3. #2
    Moonlight Cat's Avatar
    Moonlight Cat is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    November 2008
    Posts
    1,989
    Blog Entries
    1
    Thanks
    1,236
    Thanked 1,181 Times in 676 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Malikbhai View Post
    Land based casino owners are behind this lobbying effort. This is my guess.
    https://calvinayre.com/2019/01/15/bu...line-gambling/
    He-he-he US DOJ change they point of view again )) I agree, this is offline lobby. But from our (affilites) point of view - this is good. Regulated gambling in US is against our interests at this time.

  4. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Moonlight Cat For This Useful Post:

    Mario The Gambler (16 January 2019), PROFRBcom (17 January 2019)

  5. #3
    MJM
    MJM is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    November 2010
    Posts
    924
    Thanks
    186
    Thanked 547 Times in 315 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Moonlight Cat View Post
    Regulated gambling in US is against our interests at this time.
    This has just as much potential to be terrible for those of you promoting offshore sites equally to regulated ones. The timing of this is terrible, and reeks of Adelsons dirty fingerprints. The flood gates were about to open, now I predict a giant "pause" to the industry.

    A couple good things will come of this, in my opinion though:

    1. I suspect NJ and others will immediately sue and try to get an injunction.

    2. I think this will create a united front to interests in support of this - I can see lottery, casinos, etc all joining forces to fight this. That has the potential to be a good thing.

    I prefer the state by state model to a federal option, but we may now need congress to clean this up. Cluster+****. Frustrating.

  6. #4
    Join Date
    November 2005
    Posts
    4,510
    Blog Entries
    1
    Thanks
    1,920
    Thanked 2,216 Times in 1,278 Posts

    Default

    Buggered if I know how they could interpret it to include online-gambling...

    The law-makers themselves in 1961 didn't have crystal balls, so they would have based this law on exactly what its supposed to represent and protect against...wire (aka phone-lines). Besides, wouldn't they (DoJ) need a high-court ruling on this, if they were go ahead and prosecute. Just because they're the DoJ, doesn't mean they have the power to write new laws into old laws, does it?

    Granted 'Black Friday' was another DoJ initiative, but they had the UIGEA on their side for that one. And, they only (AFIK) seized dot-com's.

  7. #5
    MJM
    MJM is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    November 2010
    Posts
    924
    Thanks
    186
    Thanked 547 Times in 315 Posts

    Default

    ^^ Like the supreme court ruling earlier this year, it will become a states rights issue pretty quickly imo - or at least thats what the states will argue.

    This is all just a "if you can't win, delay delay delay" thing from Adelsons camp, with NJ so successful there is just no way in hell that cat is going back in the bag.

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to MJM For This Useful Post:

    -Shay- (15 January 2019)

  9. #6
    Top Domains's Avatar
    Top Domains is offline Public Member
    Join Date
    December 2016
    Posts
    344
    Thanks
    67
    Thanked 123 Times in 94 Posts

    Default

    UIGEA was a sneaky midnight drop under cover of darkness. They can't win this time. The cat is out of the bag. I think MJM is right and this has the potential to be a good thing that winds up having the opposite effect of accelerating the industry after its delay.

  10. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Top Domains For This Useful Post:

    Cash Bonus (16 January 2019), MJM (16 January 2019)

  11. #7
    allfreechips's Avatar
    allfreechips is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    August 2010
    Location
    Ohio - The taxing state
    Posts
    1,233
    Thanks
    163
    Thanked 684 Times in 415 Posts

    Default

    There is a LOT of money involved now with NFL and states that are on the gambling wagon, we will see a real fight and hopefully a supreme court ruling that states the US was based on gambling/ lotteries for funding so why would any gambling be illegal

    added- When will they also enforce national drug laws and raid all these growers?
    Last edited by allfreechips; 16 January 2019 at 9:43 am.
    Allfreechips online casino guide offers online casino reviews from our members. Also our exclusive No Deposit casino bonuses are always up to date. See the latest slot machine reviews at Hotslot and exclusive no deposit casino bonuses as well with a good dose of daily online gambling news to learn about pokies

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to allfreechips For This Useful Post:

    MJM (16 January 2019)

  13. #8
    JCA
    JCA is offline Public Member
    Join Date
    October 2018
    Posts
    21
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    It seems that there is a general regulatory trend to create strict rules protecting players. For example, such rules may include "emergency exit" button and other specific requirements. Even those countries, where gambling was entirely unregulated or regulation was weak are going to apply new rules, so it makes no surprise that US will impose new restricitons.

  14. #9
    potentialeight's Avatar
    potentialeight is offline Public Member
    Join Date
    January 2016
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    131
    Thanks
    21
    Thanked 35 Times in 27 Posts

    Default

    I'm also of the opinion that this is going to end up being a good thing one way or another.
    Fresh Online Casino SEO Strategy Guides for 2022 - http://www.potentialeight.com

  15. #10
    Malikbhai is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    September 2017
    Posts
    758
    Thanks
    204
    Thanked 376 Times in 245 Posts

    Default

    Grey is better. Grey works.

  16. The Following User Says Thank You to Malikbhai For This Useful Post:

    PROFRBcom (17 January 2019)

  17. #11
    gil.langelaan's Avatar
    gil.langelaan is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    July 2018
    Location
    Johannesburg
    Posts
    966
    Thanks
    110
    Thanked 308 Times in 244 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Malikbhai View Post

    Land based casino owners are behind this lobbying effort. This is my guess.
    I hate to put on my tinfoil hat, but what other variants are there? If you follow the ones who profit the most, this is the only reason.

    Quote Originally Posted by AussieDave View Post
    Buggered if I know how they could interpret it to include online-gambling...
    That's part and parcel of being a lawmaker. You have to stretch things even if it makes little sense.

  18. #12
    PROFRBcom's Avatar
    PROFRBcom is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    April 2013
    Posts
    2,169
    Thanks
    1,510
    Thanked 1,243 Times in 808 Posts

    Default

    I predicted back in 2011, after "Black Friday", that it would take decades to work out the online poker debacle in the USA. I think I'm being proven correct.

  19. #13
    Malikbhai is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    September 2017
    Posts
    758
    Thanks
    204
    Thanked 376 Times in 245 Posts

    Default

    PA has caved, instead of fighting back.

    Pennsylvania warns online gambling licensees to comply with new Wire Act opinion

    https://calvinayre.com/2019/01/19/bu...mply-wire-act/

  20. #14
    Malikbhai is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    September 2017
    Posts
    758
    Thanks
    204
    Thanked 376 Times in 245 Posts

    Default

    All this is good as long as the DOJ doesn't start putting online affiliates of offshore books in penitentiaries.

    American affiliates never paid any price, but their other countrymen did; owners of 5dimes, betonline etc., forced to live on islands having attained the American dream, but never really being able to enjoy it and have normal lives.

    Affiliates got rich at their expensive, taking 30% and walking away; never having to worry about the Federales.

  21. The Following User Says Thank You to Malikbhai For This Useful Post:

    Mario The Gambler (21 January 2019)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •