Printable View
Hi,
Hypothetical...
If a player received two (2) bonuses of the same value ($100 @ 10x wagering for each bonus), and both bonuses were activated at the same time, would this make the wagering accumulative?
EG -
- $100 (bonus) + $100 (bonus) = $200 bonus;
- 10x (wagering) + 10x (wagering) = 20x wagering requirement.
I believe it would. However what are your thoughts?
I would not have thought so.
I would have thought as each bonus was 10x and the total given is $200 - then the wagering requirement was 10x $200 = $2000.
I would wonder why someone got two bonuses though? A deposit and a re-deposit ?
Agree With Gooner, 10X is 10X on 100 or 200
1000 per 100, so 200 is 2000, (200 X 10)
The result would be accumulative but not the multiplier.
- (10 x $100) + (10 x $100) = $2000 wagering requirement.
I did see this argument on AGD and agree with the above three explanations.
For once Dave your maths does look to be wrong which is something that does not happen often :grin:
Of course, this only applies if the casino in question does not have skewed ways of dealing with multiple bonus wagering.
This can happen if you take too many holidays. ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by PromoteCasino
Well I guess I own Vlad an apology then.