Originally Posted by
TheGooner
It's not really a question of "re-prove" - but the situation just showed how little any AM can do in a bad situation.
Accordingly, what this showed was that even with a great AM up front, it is the credentials of the company that are of paramount importance to the longevity of the program and when that changes then it's like dealing with a new company.
To me the situation did not tarnish Martyn's reputation specifically, but it reduced the standing of ALL AM's when evaluating a program.
It's great to see Martyn back - but if he's fronting a "start-up" then it has all the risks inherent with a new company - no matter the quality of the AM.