solving http2 issue

GPS keeps giving me a recommendation to use HTTP/2

But I thought that would only be the case if I wasn't on https, which I am.

Any ideas what might be happening?


PS might know what's causing it, if anyone else is getting the same. Just got this from WPX hosting support (so it might be a WPX issue only).....



We are aware of the issue and have contacted the Lighthouse developers regarding it.

You can track it on their GitHub Issue page: Thank you for reaching out.

Overall the resolution should not take more than a day or two(depending on the Google Developers).

I'm not sure to understand the question.
If you talk about enabling HTTP/2 for the site in your signature: HTTP2 is already enabled.

No. the Google page speed tool is throwing up an HTTP/2 error that it shouldn't...and hence affecting the speed score negatively

I've since found out it's a known problem that may/will be affecting many site scores....

This thread seems to refer to it....https://github.com/GoogleChrome/lighthouse/issues/7326

HTTP/2 is derived from Google's SPDY protocol. It differs from HTTP/1.1 in that the browser and server agree to bundle fetch requests in a single TCP connection.

In other words, HTTP/1.0 and HTTP/1.1 require that the browser open new TCP connections for each resource requested:

• Page URL
• Stylesheet 1
• Stylesheet 2 ...
• Stylesheet ... n
• Font 1 ...
• Font ... n
• Analytics code 1 ...
• Analytics code ... n
• etc.

Every request goes "Open Connection", "Make request", "receive response", "close connection". It's very time-consuming.

With HTTP/2, the browser and server use a single stream, so the connection stays open and they maintain communication all through the process of downloading the page and its resources.

There is a known risk of what's called a "race condition" (and a few have been documented in the wild but they are still unlikely). When a race condition occurs, the server accidentally mingles data from two streams (totally separate connections) together. I don't know of any cases where race conditions have been exploited by hackers.

HTTP/3 is more secure than HTTP/2 but hasn't yet been widely adopted. * See below.

HTTP/2 is still only used by a minority of Websites and it's only in the last few months that Google's tools have begun ATTEMPTING to work with HTTP/2 connections.

It hurts nothing to activate HTTP/2 on your server as long as you keep HTTP/1.1 active so that clients can fall back to that protocol.


* ADDED ON EDIT. According to Wikipedia, HTTP/3 is still an "upcoming protocol".

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Michael Martinez

* ADDED ON EDIT. According to Wikipedia, HTTP/3 is still an "upcoming protocol".

---

So, this means that Google still has time to screw it up.

Just Kidding....sorta

Great explanation Michael

Rick
Universal4