Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    The Buzz's Avatar
    The Buzz is offline GPWA Gossip Hound
    Join Date
    February 2007
    Location
    Newton, MA
    Posts
    4,493
    Thanks
    458
    Thanked 2,033 Times in 1,272 Posts

    Default Breaking News: PokerStars no longer accepting players from Washington

    In a late-breaking development, online poker giant PokerStars have informed residents from the state of Washington that they will not be accepting real-money play.

    Here is the announcement from PokerStars:

    PokerStars today announced that it would cease providing real-money poker to residents of Washington State. To date, PokerStars has operated in Washington on the basis of legal opinions where the central advice was that the state could not constitutionally regulate Internet poker, or at least could not discriminate in favor of local cardrooms and against online sites. Last week, however, the Washington Supreme Court for the first time rejected that position and upheld the state's Internet gaming prohibition.

    In light of this decision, following extensive consultation with our legal advisors, we believe that the right course of action is to now block real money play by Washington residents on the PokerStars.com site. This policy will remain in effect until the law changes or subsequent legal challenges succeed. Our decision to block real money play in Washington does not affect the balance of funds in customer accounts, which remain completely safe. Our payment services team continues to be available to Washington State residents to assist with cashout requests.

    We regret this decision, which will no doubt disappoint our customers in Washington State. However, in all of the jurisdictions where we operate, we are committed to making responsible decisions that are based on a full and considered understanding of the most up-to-date legal advice.

    PokerStars remains supportive of passing sensible Internet poker regulation in the United States that will provide much-needed tax revenues and formalize consumer protections. PokerStars operates under those conditions, complying with rigorous licensing regimes, for its worldwide operations in the Isle of Man (UK), and for local operations in Italy, France and Estonia.

  2. #2
    The Buzz's Avatar
    The Buzz is offline GPWA Gossip Hound
    Join Date
    February 2007
    Location
    Newton, MA
    Posts
    4,493
    Thanks
    458
    Thanked 2,033 Times in 1,272 Posts

    Default

    Casino City's Aaron Todd wrote a piece about the move today as well:

    Matt Affleck has had his share of bad beats in 2010, but believe it or not, a decision by PokerStars announced today might be the worst.

    The world's largest online poker room has banned Affleck and the rest of the 6.66 million people who live in the state of Washington from playing real-money games. The decision comes a week after the state's Supreme Court ruled that a statewide ban on Internet gambling is not unconstitutional.

    "In light of this decision, following extensive consultation with our legal advisors, we believe that the right course of action is to now block real money play by Washington residents on the PokerStars.com site," reads an announcement on the site. "This policy will remain in effect until the law changes or subsequent legal challenges succeed."

    "It's always a good thing when people try to comply with laws," said Susan Arland, Public Information Officer for the Washington State Gambling Commission. "I think they're obviously trying to protect themselves, but I think it's the right thing to do."

    Affleck, one of the most well-known players affected, posted the news on his Facebook page via a Blackberry update from London, where he is playing in the first day of the European Poker Tour's Main Event. According to OfficialPokerRankings.com, Affleck, who plays under the username "mcmatto," won nearly $800,000 in multi-table tournaments on the site with more than $585,000 in profit in 2009, thanks in large part to a $550,000 score in a Spring Championship of Online Poker event. To make matters worse, according to his Facebook page, Affleck recently bought a condo in Seattle, with the down payment most likely coming from the $500,000 consolation prize he won for his 15th-place finish at the World Series of Poker Main Event, making the logistics of moving to live in another state much more complex and costly.

    "In all of the jurisdictions where we operate, we are committed to making responsible decisions that are based on a full and considered understanding of the most up-to-date legal advice," reads the PokerStars statement. "PokerStars remains supportive of passing sensible Internet poker regulation in the United States that will provide much-needed tax revenues and formalize consumer protections."

    The law makes it a Class C felony for a player to gamble or play poker on the Internet. And while the law has been on the books for more than four years, no player in Washington has ever being prosecuted or charged with the crime of gambling or playing poker on the Internet.

    "We are focusing on the people who are providing the service," said Amy Hunter, Communications and Legal Division Administrator for the Washington State Gambling Commission. "If we came across one of those people's names as we were doing those investigations, our first step would generally be to send them a letter that says, 'Your name came up in records as someone who is placing these bets, and just in case you didn't know, it's a felony in this state.'"

    Neither Hunter nor Arland was aware of any letters being sent to online gamblers to inform them that they were breaking the law.

    The story in Washington is most certainly not over. As of Thursday afternoon, Full Tilt Poker, the second-largest Internet poker room on the planet, was still accepting play from Washington residents, and customer support has not yet responded to a request for their plans for the future. And Lee Rousso, the lawyer who lost the case against the state in the Washington State Supreme Court, has said he would like to take his complaint all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court. However, that could take years, and the court may not even decide to hear such a case. If Affleck can take any consolation from the day, it's that most of his online success this year has come at Full Tilt, where he's posted a profit of more than $163,000 this year, while he's down a bit on the year at PokerStars.

    NOTES: Players who live in Washington will be able to cash out their PokerStars balances, and pending tournament tickets and T$ will be converted to cash available for withdrawal. Players will retain their VIP status and can play at that level if/when they move to a new state, or if the law changes, and players will be able to purchase VIP cash bonuses with their Frequent Player Points with no play-through requirements.

  3. #3
    MartyDavis's Avatar
    MartyDavis is offline Non-sponsor Affiliate Program
    Join Date
    April 2010
    Location
    Costa Rica
    Posts
    29
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 13 Times in 5 Posts

    Default Uncertainty

    This industry is full of uncertainty so making the right decision and taking action is just as riddled with uncertainty. I was part of the merger when Leisure and Gaming bought NINE.com and went public along with VIP and English Harbor. It sounded like the right thing to do at the time and within a few months the UIGEA passed…who knew.

    It was a devastating blow and drove the company back under ground and financially the company took a huge blow. In hind sight I know they would have never made the move to go public but the intensions and the decision to move in that direction was a great move but the timing was terrible.

    Let’s hope this decision by Poker Stars does not meet with similar consequences.

    Cheers,

    Marty Davis
    Sr. Marketing Manager
    Gambling Wages
    md@gwages.com


  4. #4
    davenewgates's Avatar
    davenewgates is offline Public Member
    Join Date
    June 2010
    Location
    Over the Web
    Posts
    351
    Thanks
    11
    Thanked 24 Times in 22 Posts

    Default

    That's a bad news for online poker players in Washington, knowing PokerStars as one of the biggest poker sites.

  5. #5
    rod.collins's Avatar
    rod.collins is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    October 2009
    Location
    Mexico
    Posts
    72
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 21 Times in 18 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by davenewgates View Post
    That's a bad news for online poker players in Washington, knowing PokerStars as one of the biggest poker sites.
    You would think that with all the financial issues many U.S states are experiencing they would think differently, after all this is tax revenue.

    Rod

  6. #6
    Tower_Stuart's Avatar
    Tower_Stuart is offline Non-sponsor Affiliate Program
    Join Date
    August 2010
    Posts
    36
    Thanks
    4
    Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rod.collins View Post
    You would think that with all the financial issues many U.S states are experiencing they would think differently, after all this is tax revenue.

    Rod
    Indeed. Especially looking at some of the decisions that California has made lately regarding certain illegal activities in the States. My own thoughts were that the U.S. was moving more toward regulation and taxation, rather than away.

  7. #7
    Smoky89 is offline Public Member
    Join Date
    November 2009
    Posts
    19
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    This is just incredible that Us player always have problems with online poker rooms, and the rules changing so often. It most be very annoying.

  8. #8
    davenewgates's Avatar
    davenewgates is offline Public Member
    Join Date
    June 2010
    Location
    Over the Web
    Posts
    351
    Thanks
    11
    Thanked 24 Times in 22 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Smoky89 View Post
    This is just incredible that Us player always have problems with online poker rooms, and the rules changing so often. It most be very annoying.
    Yep. Quite annoying..

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •