Apparently the unnamed whistle-blower was unavailable when they tried to reach him on the phone to ask him some more questions.
The BBC subsequently attempted to contact the player again to ask for clarification on exactly how much a player could earn from match-fixing in a year, but he was unavailable.
So basically, some guy talked **** without naming anyone and without taking any responsibility for his words, and all the media thought it's an interesting piece to present to the readers. By today's low standards, of course.
Perhaps he got some money for the story.
No newspaper with any dignity would post an article with an unknown source not mentioning any names and not offering any evidence. However, newspapers without dignity would be all over it just to get a couple of thousand clicks.
Besides, the guy is probably talking about low-level matches no one cares about. Everyone knows tennis players are rather pragmatic and often intentionally lose just to go home so they can prepare for their desired tournament. They're timing their form and timing their appearances. Very few players are at 100% all of the time. Sometimes they just want to get some money, party, and go home. Sometimes they let their friends win.
They're a strange bunch and a closed system. I'm sure there is match fixing, but this article is a joke and it doesn't prove anything. It's just sensationalistic journalism of the lowest kind.
I hate match fixing talk. There's an entire subculture of people believing most matches in which the favorite doesn't win are fixed. Southampton beats Arsenal 4-0? Obviously fixed, right? I hate that.
Professional bizdev can help you, the affiliate, to negotiate better terms with casinos. PM for details and a free evaluation of what I can do for you. All geos.