Something I've noticed watching a few markets lately. There's usually a pattern that you can follow before market bans. It usually shows up months before anything official happens.
Chile was a great example, the state lottery operators filed a lawsuit well before any real enforcement. When an incumbent stops competing and starts calling regulators instead, meaning that something is usually already moving behind the scenes.
Brazil this year as well, Pixbet got raided across five states, 549 CPFs of dead people in the scheme, over a billion reals frozen, as a result the licence gone the same day. Regulators need a viral story to attach to it. Looking at Lula right now, he had already been saying he is ready to shut down all betting, and that kind of statement from a head of state usually means something is already drafted.
Also, banks and payment providers tighten requirements before the regulator acts. Denmark blocked Inpay from new iGaming deals specifically over weak AML controls. Money gets cut off faster than laws get passed.
The strange thing about Brazil right now is it's showing the opposite signals simultaneously, crackdown and increasing transparency. Not sure what to make of that, honestly. Maybe both things are just true at once.


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote

