LinkBack URL
About LinkBacksHey guys,
I have $200 of Amazon.com vouchers, however even though one's Amazon account works at all local Amazon stores, stupidly you're not allowed to transfer these vouchers to Amazon.co.uk!! Ridiculous. This means a) I can't buy half of what I want and b) shiping costs are expensive.
The UK value is just shy of £140. Any Americans want to buy me £120 of Amazon.co.uk or Paypal me $175 in return for receiving my $200 Amazon.com?
If so, PM me. Only good rep GPWA members please.
Cheers
Simmo!
Results 1 to 9 of 9
-
26 December 2008, 5:23 pm #1
Public Member
- Join Date
- July 2004
- Posts
- 893
- Thanks
- 239
- Thanked 406 Times in 226 Posts
Have $200 Amazon.com vouchers, need for Amazon.co.uk. Anyone?
-
28 December 2008, 4:53 am #2
Public Member
- Join Date
- November 2008
- Location
- Israel
- Posts
- 20
- Thanks
- 2
- Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
That is ridiculous.
David Bernstein
Account Manager RPM Poker
Telephone: +44 203 287 0428
Messenger: Davidrpm@live.co.uk
Skype: accountmanagerrpm
$25 Instant Cash
-
29 December 2008, 12:33 pm #3
Private Member
- Join Date
- March 2006
- Posts
- 495
- Thanks
- 610
- Thanked 267 Times in 148 Posts
Seems like a fair deal to me. Another idea is if you want to buy something Simmo ship it to me and I can bring it along with me to London if you like.
-
29 December 2008, 12:54 pm #4
Public Member
- Join Date
- July 2004
- Posts
- 893
- Thanks
- 239
- Thanked 406 Times in 226 Posts
Thanks BS. I think what RPM was refering to was the fact you can't transfer vouchers between .com and .co.uk rather than my offer. At least I hope so LOL
Originally Posted by bonustreak
-
30 December 2008, 1:03 am #5
Private Member
- Join Date
- March 2006
- Posts
- 495
- Thanks
- 610
- Thanked 267 Times in 148 Posts
Yeap I am sure that is what he/she was referring to otherwise my claws would have shown..lol
-
30 December 2008, 7:42 pm #6
Private Member
- Join Date
- March 2005
- Posts
- 4,985
- Thanks
- 1,933
- Thanked 1,885 Times in 1,223 Posts
Very scaarrry! Originally Posted by bonustreak
I'm sure that is what is meant. If not, that is ok too. Free speech!Last edited by mojo; 30 December 2008 at 8:03 pm.
-
The Following User Says Thank You to mojo For This Useful Post:
bonustreak (5 January 2009)
-
31 December 2008, 6:41 am #7
Public Member
- Join Date
- July 2004
- Posts
- 893
- Thanks
- 239
- Thanked 406 Times in 226 Posts
That is ridiculous! Originally Posted by mojo
-
The Following User Says Thank You to Simmo! For This Useful Post:
bonustreak (5 January 2009)
-
31 December 2008, 9:19 am #8
Private Member
- Join Date
- March 2005
- Posts
- 4,985
- Thanks
- 1,933
- Thanked 1,885 Times in 1,223 Posts
Originally Posted by Simmo!
That is ridiculous!
-
5 January 2009, 10:52 pm #9
Private Member
- Join Date
- March 2006
- Posts
- 495
- Thanks
- 610
- Thanked 267 Times in 148 Posts
Reply With Quote
Posting Permissions