Hello,
Only a Ban can stop this "person"....and yes this is a serious question.
Regards
Yes..
No...
Hello,
Only a Ban can stop this "person"....and yes this is a serious question.
Regards
BestBonusBets (15 January 2018)
We should ban you.
BestBonusBets (15 January 2018), Roulette Zeitung (15 January 2018)
BestBonusBets (15 January 2018), eenzoo (15 January 2018), Scampi (14 January 2018)
I guess I am a bit of a softie and voted No..... For Now.... ( This could change tomorrow though LOL )
I do agree that he or she is extremely painful in view of the need to comment on every post, but the funny thing is that I get the feeling that it is more out of ignorance and trying to be friendly, rather than malicious intent.
I may be completely wrong though, and my suggestion would be for admin to send a private message to advise that every post does not need to be commented on, and if it continues with no actual value being added, then perhaps a warning and then a ban...
Online Casinos| SA Casinos | Best Online Casinos | Rand Casinos | Online Slot | Online Casinos | Best Slots Games
Follow Us on Twitter
BestBonusBets (15 January 2018), elgoog (15 January 2018)
Chasing after people with health problems is one of the most disgusting things I experienced in my long life.
And this is exactly, what you voted for with "yes", you anonymous idiots!
Votes: 10 Yes - 5 No
Yes, I do not violate any rules, because the coward anonymous "yes" voters I can call "idiots", because there is no member name, I could allegedly insult. I can't address the "idiot" truth straight into their face, calling them by name, and I would be proud of my CCM cease-and-desist order after I did this.
This is now already the 2nd time during this fresh year I feel ashamed for other GPWA members postings.
First, there was the attempt to quasi downplay child abuse by a bunch of narcissistic No-Brain-Coiners and now the 4th re-run of the same witch hunt despite the thread starter knows it better.
"I get the feeling that it is more out of ignorance and trying to be friendly, rather than malicious intent"
This is correct, Heather. And there is a reason for it. I wrote you a PM about it, and have no problem, Eissa now knows, that PM was written. As always, I have nothing to hide. He must make more improvements, and I demand this, but this forum - as long as I am here - will not end as a Forum with "Final Solution" ideas, that '"special" people with health problems will be virtually euthanized.
Yes, I very very rarely play the Nazi-Card, once in 3 years probably, but I tried it polite, a little bit harder, very hard, obviously this is the only language, that will be understand.
Of course, everyone can have his opinion and start such a poll, but then I have also the right to say my thoughts. And I will use this possibility as long as I can.
If one does not like Eissa's posts, then go and use this ignore button, people say, it exists here. Because he is writing his own messages and many times out of context, then you put no harm on your reading and understanding comfort of a thread if you use this button or simply scroll down.
Is this so difficult?
A better solution then calling for the electric chair.
Again, the following statement is the truth, the right feeling and a fact, you should think about it: "I get the feeling that it is more out of ignorance and trying to be friendly, rather than malicious intent"
... on the contrary to other people here.
I am very thankful for every smart "no" voter!
Leopold
Last edited by Roulette Zeitung; 15 January 2018 at 5:37 am.
-Shay- (15 January 2018), BestBonusBets (15 January 2018), Cash Bonus (15 January 2018), dylan_moran98 (2 February 2019), freakspin (15 January 2018), ocreditor (17 January 2018), Scampi (15 January 2018), Topboss (15 January 2018)
I am here to help if you have any issues with an affiliate program.
Become involved in GPWA to truly make the association your own:
Apply for Private Membership | Apply for the GPWA Seal | Partner with a GPWA Sponsor | Volunteer as a Moderator
BestBonusBets (15 January 2018), Cash Bonus (15 January 2018), ocreditor (17 January 2018), Roulette Zeitung (15 January 2018)
Dear Leo,
We all know nobody get banned after a vote...Yes or No...nobody cares at the end.
But i never seen a spammer, with health problems - this person know exactly what she does.
Best example are the "thanks for the payment posts" the time is right - easy to find out which program pays and when.
Only that it usually does not match with other affilates..
And no,i dont hate this person - i want only a lil bit more quality on board
Regards
*This Thread can be moved to the the privat section,or completely removed from the pub. board.
BestBonusBets (15 January 2018), eenzoo (15 January 2018), RacingJim (15 January 2018)
perhaps a small annoyance but not worthy of a ban.
Last edited by slotplayer; 15 January 2018 at 9:55 am.
BestBonusBets (15 January 2018)
"This Thread can be moved to the the privat section,or completely removed from the pub. board."
Objection!
Too many people have read this shameful witch hunt before I wrote a clarification to debunk the claims and so many people built a false opinion about that person. If this thread now vanishes from the public, the false opinions remains, and this is not good.
Close to 24 hours are too much. Too many false opinions built. Opening such a poll on weekends, when everyone knows, that also Anthony need an weekend, ...
It's about you to decide if it is coincidence or not.
It is an old trick, in case, an attempt to smear, slander or discredit an innocent person in a forum mutates after 18+ hours into a total flop, to request a removal from the public, so that one cannot be called on that in the future, because what vanishes, cannot be quoted again, and as you may know, quotes are the most powerful tool you have in a forum.
Don't underestimate that!
A public request to burn innocent people alive, THIS would be worth a ban some may say, right?
But I would never request a ban, because everyone has the right of free speech and every idiot the right to be debunked by others.
Leopold
BestBonusBets (15 January 2018), Cash Bonus (15 January 2018)
If no one is banned by the way of a vote like this, then that begs the question of why create a poll in the first place? A better solution rather than attempting to go all mob is to either use the forum's ignore feature or to demonstrate the mental discipline simply to scan past a post or poster you do not wish to read.
BestBonusBets (15 January 2018), Cash Bonus (15 January 2018), PlayHunter (17 January 2018), Roulette Zeitung (15 January 2018), Scampi (15 January 2018), universal4 (16 January 2018)
While I think a ban is too harsh, and it makes no difference whether someone is annoying or not, I believe the "good luck" he/she wished to Skybet when many of us lost their lively hoods was pretty stupid and idiotic.
BestBonusBets (15 January 2018), PROFRBcom (16 January 2018)
This person really gets on my nerves, but I was feeling forgiving and charitable today so voted no. Until next time.
End of the day I agree with progger's post. I never saw a spammer with autism/aspergers whatever else it is or might be?! It's just pointless platitudes all the time, very little of value in any of it, that's not how those people are, those people with those sorts of issues would still be able to contribute a great deal to a forum I believe.
BestBonusBets (15 January 2018)
Hey everyone,
First of all, right now I want to speak simply as Luke and not as a program representative who tries to build a name for his brand.
In my opinion, posts of vtyunby65 bring no harm to the community. A person tries to contribute in his own manner and style and if someone doesn't like it - it's someones own issue that shouldn't be highlighted.
I personally think that this is the perfect example of high-school style bullying that received a second life in the adult world.
Kind regards,
Luke
-Shay- (15 January 2018), BestBonusBets (15 January 2018), Cash Bonus (15 January 2018), CasinoDefence (16 January 2018), GPWA Maria (2 November 2018), Roulette Zeitung (17 January 2018), Scampi (15 January 2018)
If these are genuine posts then I don't mind, as many others have said if you don't like them just skim past them and don't read them.
My issue would be the frequency of posts, especially one after another in the same thread. To me it seems this may be designed to get the home page site of the month spot and link!?
This isn't necessarily specific to this person either. A lot of new people who sign up to GPWA go post ten random times so they can get access to private messages, post links, etc.
Maybe it is just part and parcel of a public forum, got to take the rough with the smooth.
-Shay- (15 January 2018), allaboutthebets (15 January 2018), Anthony (15 January 2018), BestBonusBets (15 January 2018), Cash Bonus (15 January 2018), PlayHunter (17 January 2018)
Is this really a serious poll?
The most I've seen is a comment always followed by a "have a nice day" at the end.
At worst if you don't like someones post, keep scrolling?
I can see the humour if this was for fun, but Cleary it's not :/
Cash Bonus (15 January 2018)
Of course this can not be a serious topic.
I always see a polite and caring person, if you do not like the posts, go ahead.
More peace and tolerance, this is what we need
Be happy!
Cash Bonus (15 January 2018)
It is annoying, the frequent of posts, often complete senseless, often misleading or wrong infos. Just to push the post counter.
I´ve ignored the member already.
The "ignore member" function works well. So far I have ignored two very irritating members and one very bombastic one.![]()
There are quite a few new members doing the same, commenting on every single thread sometimes upto 10-20 times .. and also hundreds of new posts daily most of them ridiculous (why is the sky blue) type posts. banning wont help my suggestion is to make all backlinks no-follow that way gpwa is not used a a tool to create thousands of gambling related backlinks (My opinion on why so much spam) a few members that spam here do not do so on the other forum (AFG) perhaps because no juicy do follow links are given.
RacingJim (16 January 2018), thebookiesoffers (16 January 2018)
A ban is probably a bit harsh. He or she is harmless enough and doesn't mean any wrong.
The pointless replying to threads that don't need replying to do question the motives e.g.
I am sorry to hear that
I hope this gets resolved for you etc
RacingJim (16 January 2018)