Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    casionmark is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    November 2016
    Posts
    473
    Thanks
    353
    Thanked 128 Times in 95 Posts

    Default AHREFs vs Keyword Planner

    Hi - If keyword planner and AHREFs disagree on monthly search volumes, who would you trust better? e..g if a term is reported as 260 / month in KP and 20 per month in AHREFs. Which is more likely to be nearer the mark?

    Thanks,

  2. #2
    wonderpunter's Avatar
    wonderpunter is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    August 2013
    Posts
    3,411
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks
    427
    Thanked 2,003 Times in 1,255 Posts

    Default

    Neither... they are all so far off in search volumes, i think they crawl 2-3% of real actual queries and seem to favor old websites giving higher scores becuase they have crawled links for over 5-6 years whereas new sites that rank for higher volume and higher value keywords will show less even if real google results show otherwise..

    What they are good at is giving you a rough Idea with backlinks, popular older keywords etc but if you are targeting serious money keywords you need to do it manually


  3. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to wonderpunter For This Useful Post:

    bossrm (22 February 2018), eenzoo (26 January 2018)

  4. #3
    eenzoo's Avatar
    eenzoo is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    November 2014
    Location
    Bella Italia
    Posts
    1,898
    Thanks
    614
    Thanked 1,241 Times in 768 Posts

    Default

    Imo ... nobody. This is just guess with help of same resources. I've optimized on keys with zero volume and get 200 super valuable clicks a month. Also i have top 3 rankings for a "12k" key and there is almost zero.

    Keyword research i regions of under 500 visits a month is for me more instinct and some logical thoughts than a "measurable" decision.

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to eenzoo For This Useful Post:

    casionmark (26 January 2018)

  6. #4
    wonderpunter's Avatar
    wonderpunter is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    August 2013
    Posts
    3,411
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks
    427
    Thanked 2,003 Times in 1,255 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by eenzoo View Post
    Imo ... nobody. This is just guess with help of same resources. I've optimized on keys with zero volume and get 200 super valuable clicks a month. Also i have top 3 rankings for a "12k" key and there is almost zero.

    Keyword research i regions of under 500 visits a month is for me more instinct and some logical thoughts than a "measurable" decision.
    Right? in the real world there is also variations too.. i have one keyword that has a 300 volume by ahrefs yet brings in thousands of visits, these SEO tools were made to fill a gap once you get used to working without them so much more is achievable than worrying about artificial tool scores, btw I see Alexa has just started turing itslef into a serious SEO tool lol


  7. The Following User Says Thank You to wonderpunter For This Useful Post:

    casionmark (26 January 2018)

  8. #5
    GaryTheScubaGuy's Avatar
    GaryTheScubaGuy is offline In Memorium, 1966-2018
    Join Date
    December 2008
    Location
    Malta
    Posts
    745
    Blog Entries
    22
    Thanks
    223
    Thanked 430 Times in 205 Posts

    Default

    Do what you will with what you will, but these days our kw research is done using LongTailPro and hrefs Content Gap. these are the lower hanging fruit that convert 3x better but takes diligent work.

    20 yrs in gaming and kw's have barely changed except on slots, so we already know the Hollywood and primary terms. We'll integrate both of thsee lists together semantically to produce content.

    GTSG
    GaryTheScubaGuy

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •