Content Spin. Yes or not?

[CHIC21]

Interested in your feedback or better results. If anyone has tried cloning texts for their projects. The target is to lower costs when producing new sites. Does the method live?

[chaumi]

From a usable/publishable perspective, most spinners (in fact every one I've seen, including the supposedly good ones) give results ranging from inadequate to utter garbage. The best you can get is a reasonable spin that you then have to edit.

But that's looking at it from the viewpoint of the sort of content you'd want to be publishing on your main site(s).

Many linkbuilders (spamming left, right, and centre just for the links) use spinners successfully, and get away with it (historically, and for now...but maybe that will change).


There probably will be some cases where it will work on main sites, but it won't be the quality you really should to be looking to present.

[wonderpunter]

Youre doomed to fail

[CHIC21]

I agree, this only applies to secondary sites for links or other topics. For example, there are methods in the Russian segment for the algorithm GPT3 (Generative Pre-trained Transformer 3). There are also solutions based on neural networks.

[CHIC21]

Why? There are a lot of dorweevs in the output based on the generated text. Yes, it's a big upscaling solution, but there are working options. What do you think?

Youre doomed to fail

[insiderjoe]

No. Unless you're using it for other purposes such as low quality content to get tiered links.

[CHIC21]

Yes, as an alternative.

No. Unless you're using it for other purposes such as low quality content to get tiered links.

[insiderjoe]

So just remember that these tactics are pretty outdated and can bring more harm than good. Everything depends on your strategy, of course.

Yes, as an alternative.

[CHIC21]

I agree with you. That's why I asked if anyone has working plans.

So just remember that these tactics are pretty outdated and can bring more harm than good. Everything depends on your strategy, of course.

[CharlesLund]

Spun content has no value in today world.

You would just be wasting your time.

Read up on Googles BERT and MUM systems.

At the end of the day, you need to write engaging content that solves your users search intent - not rubbish barely readable spun content.

[CHIC21]

Thank you for your opinion. I support it, too.

Spun content has no value in today world.

You would just be wasting your time.

Read up on Googles BERT and MUM systems.

At the end of the day, you need to write engaging content that solves your users search intent - not rubbish barely readable spun content.

[magnusbrand]

Spun content can rank and bring traffic only in extreme non competitive niches where Google would find it hard to bring any relevant search results else in 99.9% of case, spun content is useless.

[johan_s]

No FFS.

[CHIC21]

What does this mean?

No FFS.

[iso2009]

You can use Quillbot to rewrite chunks of content. It works pretty well if you make minor adjustments.

[gm2891]

You can use Quillbot to rewrite chunks of content. It works pretty well if you make minor adjustments.

Never heard of Quillbot.
I use the Wordtune paid extension; loving it!
Really helpful for an item descriptions when no idea comes to my empty head...

[gil.langelaan]

Interested in your feedback or better results. If anyone has tried cloning texts for their projects. The target is to lower costs when producing new sites. Does the method live?

Yes, the method is live, and sometimes it works. But I would not recommend to use it. It could have a harmful effect for your rankings in perspective.

[DaftDog]

What does this mean?

No FFS. (No, for **** sakes!)

[daniel-king777]

Recently I have tried to spin the content and it seems pretty good. Cheap and fast. But I would not recommend use it on your main website. Such type of content is useful for PBN or WEB 2.0 backlinks.

[oncasilab]

Demand for spin content is declining year by year.
Also, I think there is almost no demand for spin content anymore.