Different linking on the site

[CHIC21]

What do you think about different linking on the site? Has anyone done automatic solutions?

[PaulEchere]

Hey,

I'm afraid it's not quite clear (at least to me) what exactly you are referring to, do you mind expanding the idea a bit?

[gm2891]

I think he's talking about something similar to the WP plugin (forgot its name)
that suggests pages and picks words for internal linking.

I certainly wouldn't use one.

[artrust99]

Nope, I wouldn't recommend this, cause it can make a lot of these unnecessary links to other pages.

[CHIC21]

That's right, without using the plugin. I'm against them. Let me explain.

I think he's talking about something similar to the WP plugin (forgot its name)
that suggests pages and picks words for internal linking.

I certainly wouldn't use one.

[CHIC21]

Sorry, here's the extended answer:

When working through large sites, with many pages. There is often a problem getting them into the index. Namely that the search bot doesn't get to some of them.

We designed the solution:

A block is created on the site, in which urls from stack 1 are placed according to a certain logic. Stack 1 contains a list of site urls NOT in the index.

Then, each time the bot accesses our page, this block appears 3 of our urls, which the bot can easily count.

A new set of urls appears when the bot or person accesses our page.

Thus we fix each url +1 visit. Set a limit of 10 (let's say). When this number of visits reaches 10. We do not show this url.

Thus the system turns into a BOTH Catch roughly speaking.


http://prntscr.com/13ij9xd

Hey,

I'm afraid it's not quite clear (at least to me) what exactly you are referring to, do you mind expanding the idea a bit?

[CHIC21]

There was a simplified scheme, when it worked without counting the number of impressions. And pages in stack 1 were random from the site map.

[gil.langelaan]

I would also join my colleagues and say it's not a good idea to use auto plugin to do interlinking.

You could search for another plugin that would suggest a possibilities to link to specific pages and use unique anchors. We have used similar plugin and that's convenient.

[CHIC21]

We didn't use a plugin, but a custom solution. That is the sense. Also with the plugin - you get static links, not a dynamically changing stack of urls that are not in the index. That's also the whole idea: the Bot Catcher.

I would also join my colleagues and say it's not a good idea to use auto plugin to do interlinking.

You could search for another plugin that would suggest a possibilities to link to specific pages and use unique anchors. We have used similar plugin and that's convenient.

[CHIC21]

Found the old developments on this subject, but unfortunately, only on a couple of projects, managed to implement a variant with statistics. I hoped that someone else did such schemes of linking...

[CHIC21]

I would thank) if someone could share their experiences.