Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 27 of 27
  1. #21
    Pokerface's Avatar
    Pokerface is offline Public Member
    Join Date
    August 2016
    Posts
    2,673
    Blog Entries
    1
    Thanks
    446
    Thanked 879 Times in 636 Posts

    Default

    I spot check content written and overall seems not too much use of AI. A couple instances of similarities but definitely not copy/paste. Using AI for research is fine but not purely for written content.
    statsdrone.com

    GPWA members get a 2-month free trial - DM me!

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Pokerface For This Useful Post:

    universal4 (30 September 2024)

  3. #22
    VladS's Avatar
    VladS is offline Brand New Member
    Join Date
    September 2024
    Location
    Kyiv
    Posts
    14
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

    Default

    Don't see anything bad in using AI for the content.

    But you need to use a good tool ( I use Surfer ), revise it as each AI still can write some nonsense, and "humanize" it with your own point of view/ experience.

    There a lot of good tools that really make life easier, but you need to use them wisely.

  4. #23
    LimayMedia is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    September 2024
    Posts
    6
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    That was a big issue for us for a while, we are testing every single article for AI content in originality and the results are mixed, so it's not reliable as far as I know.

    We had times where we tested human-written text and it flagged it as AI, and vise-versa, carefully generated AI content that passed the detector with flying colors.

    We do ask for rewriters and revisions if we see over 50% AI generated content just in case.

  5. #24
    Neustadt's Avatar
    Neustadt is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    October 2024
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    10
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts

    Default

    That’s definitely a challenge many of us face when trying to rely on AI detectors. The fact that they can flag human-written content as AI and let carefully generated AI content slip through shows that the tools still aren’t perfect. It's good that you ask for rewrites or revisions when the AI content percentage is high—it’s a smart way to stay cautious. Hopefully, these tools will improve, but for now, it seems like a mix of human oversight and technology is the best way to manage it!

  6. #25
    GL Oncasi Ent is offline Brand New Member
    Join Date
    October 2024
    Posts
    5
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

    Default

    Engagement relies on a human touch, so it's best to avoid uploading 100% AI-generated content.
    Using AI as a starting point can be helpful, but it's essential to refine it and ensure it meets your requirements.
    AI is improving, making it harder for us to notice its use. The best solution, as others have mentioned, might be to hire a reliable copywriter.

  7. #26
    Andr is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    October 2024
    Posts
    9
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    I always check. They often use it to make their work easier

  8. #27
    Stefania Kozak's Avatar
    Stefania Kozak is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    November 2024
    Posts
    5
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    I do check if the text from copywriters is AI-generated, but not in a strict way. It's more about keeping quality consistent. If the content feels a bit robotic or off, I’ll run it through some AI detection tools just to be sure.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •