I'm not nitpicking but (for the benefit of newbies etc.) re-tagging implies a
different scenario.
- It's when a player is tagged to Affiliate-X but is then de-tagged, then re-tagged to Affiliate-Z or another party.
Whereas unethical-cross-marketing is when the "player's" referring affiliate's tag is dropped from the URL, and either replaced by a straight (non tracking link) or by the casino/affiliate program's own tracking tag.
True both examples are stealing.
- The OP has posted damning accusations, with ZERO proof. Not a damn thing.
- When Marc and Anthony have asked for their AFF Info, its been declined.
I get the OP's motivation to stay incognito on "forums".
But in this instance, using the aforementioned reason is a moot point. Instead, lets call it for what it is... nothing more than a ****-poor-excuse to give oneself carte blanche to slag-off (attack, flame, bring discredit) to FullCream, and or any other entity or person(s) the OP doesn't agree with.
There's a fine line between "free speech" and stepping over that line. In this thread, that step, over this line, is akin to 100m sprint way past it!
What's next from the OP? A thread saying 'Unicorns' are real
As an affiliate community, we've got enough genuine and bona fide "commission stealing" at programs to worry about, without having to deal with unfounded accusations of impropriety, leveled at a program, and its staff, who, are anything but...
If the OP can't, wont, refuses to provide proof etc., etc., specifically when asked by the GPWA Forum Admin, then lock the damn thread down. Simple!
Being a GPWA member is a privilege, NOT A RIGHT... nuff said.