Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    PokCas is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    February 2019
    Posts
    303
    Blog Entries
    2
    Thanks
    211
    Thanked 67 Times in 47 Posts

    Lightbulb Let's add a feedback system!

    Most of us have various transactions with each other such as content writing, SEO/Dev services, website/domain/account sales and more.

    Let's add a feedback system where private members could give each other positive/negative/neutral feedbacks.

    This way it would be easy to see who has a good track record and with whom you should be more careful.

    It should be pretty easy to add since this is a forum.



  2. The Following User Says Thank You to PokCas For This Useful Post:

    drifter8 (7 June 2021)

  3. #2
    AussieDave's Avatar
    AussieDave is offline Public Member
    Join Date
    November 2005
    Location
    from the land downunder
    Posts
    4,060
    Blog Entries
    1
    Thanks
    1,680
    Thanked 1,903 Times in 1,086 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PokCas View Post
    whom you should be more careful.
    All private members should be trustworthy, as they should have gone thru a veto system.

    Be a much better idea to have this activated on the public forums, where I'm sure, a lot more transactions take place
    ---
    Compliance: a code word for control

    ---
    Do the right thing, even when no one is looking. It's called integrity.
    ---

    It's your right to be treated honestly: fairness for all igaming affiliates - doch.news

  4. #3
    Juan Roman's Avatar
    Juan Roman is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    January 2013
    Posts
    366
    Thanks
    114
    Thanked 170 Times in 116 Posts

    Default

    Sounds like a very good idea to me, especially for the public forum as AussieDave suggests. Easier than asking around the GPWA members you do trust for advice every time you plan to do business with the not-so-familiar forum members.

    I would be happy to give feedback on people we have done business so far, and I'm sure our clients would be glad to do the same. Even though my experience is overwhelmingly positive, there were some times that I opted against name-and-shame tactics. In those cases I would have gladly given them the negative feedback.
    TeamworkContent.com - Premium iGaming content in 25+ Languages. Website development and design for iGaming websites through our partner firm.

  5. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Juan Roman For This Useful Post:

    drifter8 (7 June 2021), PokCas (13 May 2021)

  6. #4
    PokCas is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    February 2019
    Posts
    303
    Blog Entries
    2
    Thanks
    211
    Thanked 67 Times in 47 Posts

    Default

    Yeah, GPWA definitely needs some new updates, just like this one.

  7. #5
    Triple7 is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    January 2015
    Posts
    2,816
    Thanks
    2,046
    Thanked 2,443 Times in 1,321 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AussieDave View Post
    All private members should be trustworthy, as they should have gone thru a veto system.

    Be a much better idea to have this activated on the public forums, where I'm sure, a lot more transactions take place
    In theory, yes.

  8. #6
    johan_s is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    February 2020
    Posts
    226
    Thanks
    46
    Thanked 66 Times in 55 Posts

    Default

    Everyone I have met here at GPWA has been honest. So far. So I don't really think it is needed. I can see a lot of similar feedback systems and they can easily be manipulated as well.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •