The OP doesn't go to revshare because the player value is low and the OP knows it.
It looks like the 327 players deposited a total of $24,291 - or approx $74 each.
And the OP is receiving $220 CPA per player.
Factor in payment costs, and some withdrawals and values is $20-40.
Accordingly, rev-share is likely to be under $20 per player.
I'm not going to get into whether there are player enticements to join and deposit - that's unknown.
This may be a totally above board campaign - but the traffic is clearly not worth $220, $120, or even $50 CPA to the casino.
But with numbers like this showing such a large difference between realised value and payment value this deal is dead.
Should the casino program pay out ? Possibly - depending on any contract clauses on actual value.
Will the casino program pay out ? Unlikely at $220 CPA. Maybe at rev-share.
If the OP can get $220 CPAs for players that deposit $70 for other sources - then they should share the other sources.
I'd like some of that action too !!
