
Originally Posted by
PROFRBcom
Going from unfettered access to 50 states down to picking and choosing a few, and providing fingerprint identification, making physical business addresses, etc sounds awful.
Then, you only get to compete for CPAs? And have the government up your ass sideways like the UKGC for "offensive" commercials?
Naaa, no thanks.
You forgot that the companies at the US market are either new and untested or well known crooks.
I guess for the regulated US market, you can pick & choose which states you operate in (just like Europe)
In Europe this is annoying and costs sources (a lot of), in the USA this is str8 nonsense. Maybe there are some exceptions, but affiliates with search engine trafic and social network traffic do not operate on state by state level. We have all the traffic. Converting just part slashes the revenue. The paperwork slashes it further. The CPA..well.
When adding all those factors together, how much profit from the same traffic and effort remains? 5%? Probably much less. Maybe 3%-1%. It is like an awkward joke but on the other hand those funny rates are no competition for offshores. So unless much more online censorship comes to the USA, those things make offshore opeartors stronger. Especially when they do not allow regulated and unregulated bookies to be promoted on one site and we are therefore forced to choose 100% the offshore.
If you talk to God, you are praying; If God talks to you, you have schizophrenia.