Net neutrality is a nice ideal like freedom or perfect competition. And like perfect competition it never existed. And every day we go towards net non-neutrality.
And like freedom is not for everyone, net neutrality is also not for everyone. It is for people who care about it.
I wish it were for everyone, but as I am getting older I somehow accept possibility that my wish is wrong. People who get many things without fight are lazy and demand even more and more, and that is the situation now, where the monopolies have so much power. It is not that the monopolies are evil, but people are lazy and will get even more lazy.
So everyone who wants to work can work nowadays and gain huge money. Everyone who really wants freedom, can have freedom. But freedom has a price and it has to be paid. We want freedom without paying for it. We hope that if we join together, we will have our own power of monopoly of 99%. I think it is evil thinking. I am glad I can use Tor, I am glad I can have servers in chaotic countries where no one cares, I am glad I have enough money to live in Latin America and bribe people here to get passport, which helps me to get out of the system.
I am even glad that the monopoly described in the article gives me the opportunity to make money on it.
The further we go from Net neutrality, the more money will be possible to make on lazy people who will want to buy their freedom. Of course they will not get it, I sell only illusion of it, but that is their problem. Anyone who wants to fight, can fight. Alone.
We are all bloodsucking ticks, hungry, devious
each one latched on to the ass of the previous
when the last and the first latch on it can be shown
ass-blood sucked by the first from the last is his own