Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    casinorecommender is offline Former Member
    Join Date
    July 2009
    Location
    London UK
    Posts
    390
    Blog Entries
    2
    Thanks
    87
    Thanked 38 Times in 27 Posts

    Question Which one is better in terms of SEO and conversions ?


  2. #2
    thebookiesoffers is offline Former Member
    Join Date
    November 2009
    Location
    Leicester, UK
    Posts
    3,225
    Thanks
    414
    Thanked 1,764 Times in 1,009 Posts

    Default

    straight away in the willhill review, it says 'one talk about' should be talks not talk

  3. #3
    SlotsAff is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    August 2007
    Posts
    810
    Thanks
    16
    Thanked 143 Times in 108 Posts

    Default

    Can you explain what you've done differently SEO wise?

  4. #4
    casinorecommender is offline Former Member
    Join Date
    July 2009
    Location
    London UK
    Posts
    390
    Blog Entries
    2
    Thanks
    87
    Thanked 38 Times in 27 Posts

    Default

    Thanks. It is corrected. So what do you think about 2 reviews ? Which one is better ? WH ? Thanks for your kind contribution.

  5. #5
    casinorecommender is offline Former Member
    Join Date
    July 2009
    Location
    London UK
    Posts
    390
    Blog Entries
    2
    Thanks
    87
    Thanked 38 Times in 27 Posts

    Default

    In William Hill KW targetting was made. And for the other, nothing has made regarding KW targeting. William Hill content length is more than Butlers Bingo. More boldings at WH. And one more 125x125 banner at Butlers Bingo. Categorical Titles at Butlers Bingo http://casinorecommender.com/butlers-bingo-review but not in William Hill Review http://casinorecommender.com/william-hill-casino-review .

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •