Suggestion for microgaming

[nitro]

I'll be meeting with Microgaming at the Isle of Man in the next couple of days, and if you have any constructive suggestions or comments you'd like me to share with them, please post them here and I'll bring them to the table.

...and other software providers as well.

Switching the business model from selling as many software licences as possible (CTXM has an ad in 12 weeks to your own casino for example) to revenue share with far fewer trusted operations and always doing a thorough background research before opening a new one because if it is in the hands of the amateurs it will end up with conglomerates like Rival or a lot of rogues like RTG and overall more than enough casinos that just suck and altogether has the effect that far too many people play in B&M establishments that wouldn't otherwise do so with the inevitable consequences to the bottom line.

[Puma]

Nitro, I'm sorry if this sounds wrong or rude but I always get lost when I read your posts. Is it just me?

[greedygirl]

Nitro, I'm sorry if this sounds wrong or rude but I always get lost when I read your posts. Is it just me?

Not just you, Pumacat. Nitro needs a refresher course on the proper use of punctuation. Particularly with commas and periods.

[alexpratt]

...and other software providers as well.

Switching the business model from selling as many software licences as possible (CTXM has an ad in 12 weeks to your own casino for example) to revenue share with far fewer trusted operations and always doing a thorough background research before opening a new one because if it is in the hands of the amateurs it will end up with conglomerates like Rival or a lot of rogues like RTG and overall more than enough casinos that just suck and altogether has the effect that far too many people play in B&M establishments that wouldn't otherwise do so with the inevitable consequences to the bottom line.

Are you basically saying that Micro shouldn't give licences to just anyone....?.....Its my impression they don't, these days to work with Micro you need to have pass certain criteria and I hear they are pretty strict as its a big investment on their side as well when they sign up a new operator

[Nandakishore]

Are you basically saying that Micro shouldn't give licences to just anyone....?.....Its my impression they don't, these days to work with Micro you need to have pass certain criteria and I hear they are pretty strict as its a big investment on their side as well when they sign up a new operator

I think they always were. I had a contact with them around 2005/2006 because a friend of mine wanted to start an online casino. I had also contacts with others like Playtech etc. But the due diligence which Microgaming demanded from my friend was by far the most rigorous one.

[giggles7p]

Well if that is true, it would be nice that once they give away a license to a casino, that they should keep an eye on thier "so called" approved sites....seems to me that once a casino gets a license....they can do whatever they want with Microgaming....and its just fine!

[Amateur]

I'm not sure this is a suggestion, or a question:

What is the business model behind your decisions regarding limitations on US Players?

You want their money, but without incurring any risks or costs of acquiring it.

How does that work?

US Players can't play progressives, can't play new games, but you want US players to continue to spend money, while they are treated as second class citizens.

What percentage of income do you get from US players? If it's not worthwhile, why bother?