
Originally Posted by
TheGooner
TWo things on this :
1) You've picked up on two dopping cheats - which affects on field performances.
In the salary cap case its' not. It's still 13 v 13 (or 17 v 17 on interchange rules).
2) In both these cases - it was detected soon after - and OTHER people were then awarded the title of winner.
Ben Johnson and Floyd Landis know they didn't win - someone else has been declared a winner.
Tell me - who won now in the seasons when the Melbourne Storm held the trophy aloft? ... ... ... Yep no-one. Pointless.
----------------
And as for the AFL - didn't they set-up the expansion teams like the Brisbane Lions with a bigger salary cap when they first came in?
Didn't the Lions win it all THREE times with that advantage?
Are you saying that their financial salary cap advantage taints their win?
Or is that a non-issue because it's legitimate?
Exactly. Salary cap = bogus control.
------------------------
Uniform salary caps and the argument for equalisation have a negative effect on the likelihood of the creation of truely great teams - and are instead responsible for mediocre sporting standards.
Sporting fans like dynasties, they like the great teams, the Chicago Bulls, the Boston Celtics, the Detroit Red Wings and the Dallas Cowboys. Barcelona, Real Madrid and Manchester United.
Or perhaps the Manly Sea Eagles? Or great old clubs like Essendon, Collingwood and Carlton?
A free system, or at most a "soft" salary cap, with "luxury taxes" that acknowledges the existance of star players, and does not rigidly push the break-up of these star teams is far better for the sport overall.