Feedback wanted on BonusBandit.win

[NoahBonusBandit]

Hi everyone,
I’ve been building BonusBandit.win, a US sweepstakes casino site focused on whether operators actually pay and how much friction players face when redeeming.
https://bonusbandit.win/
The main feature is a public Trust Score based on first-hand redemption tests, KYC handling, terms, and complaint evidence. The scoring formula and score history are published. The site uses affiliate links, but affiliate relationships do not affect scores or rankings.
I’d especially value your first impression of the homepage, whether the methodology feels credible, whether the navigation works well on mobile, and anything that would stop you from trusting or using the site.
Please be blunt. I work on it every day, so I’m sure I’m missing things that will be obvious to a fresh set of eyes.
Thanks,
Noah

[LuckyBuddhaAffiliates]

The brand positioning is great. The design wireframe looks really good. I would add some colour to the site to make the site more engaging - and to highlight your money buttons a bit more clearly. More content on the main navigation menu's would help your retention - for example news and game reviews. Or how to guides/top 10 Megaways sweepstakes slots / sweeps live casino games etc.

Obviously we'd like to see Lucky Buddha Casino ranking better than 111/232, as we've got lots of accreditations no other sweepstakes casino platform has (e.g. GPWA Silver Sponsor), and we've been upgrading a lot of systems lately to help improve the weak points you've highlighted. It's understandable you haven't had time to test our platform yet with 232 for you to test!

[NoahBonusBandit]

Thanks, Christian. I appreciate you taking the time to look through the site. Your point about making the route into reviews and guides clearer is useful, especially on mobile. I have most of those destinations in the current navigation, so if they were easy to miss, that tells me the labeling and homepage hierarchy still need work.
On Lucky Buddha, the accreditations and recent platform improvements are useful background, but they cannot change the Trust Score by themselves. The current 57/100 is a baseline built from limited evidence. I have not completed a first-hand cashout or KYC test yet.
I would be happy to test Lucky Buddha through the ordinary player experience. Any findings, positive or negative, would go through the same published methodology, and an affiliate relationship would remain completely separate from the score. I would not want a special account or a guaranteed ranking outcome.
The standard player signup path and current public terms would be the most useful starting points. Thanks again for the candid feedback.

[KristiinaK]

Hi Noah, my 50 cents: since site is built on real payment testing, i think you should make the proof of payment screenshots more visible, not just from the casino, but also to bank account.

There seems to be some bug when i open the screenshot on mobile, i only see bottom part of image and then have to scroll upwards while image open to see rest. Hope this help with troubleshooting. (tested Playfame review on modern android device in chrome).