Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1
    The Buzz's Avatar
    The Buzz is offline GPWA Gossip Hound
    Join Date
    February 2007
    Location
    Newton, MA
    Posts
    3,578
    Thanks
    292
    Thanked 1,488 Times in 900 Posts

    Default An addict's veto

    A syndicated columnist in the Washington Times (ok, you can stop laughing now) makes the point that problem gambling is not a good reason to prevent Internet gambling.

    http://washingtontimes.com/apps/pbcs...plate=nextpage

  2. #2
    thepokerkeep's Avatar
    thepokerkeep is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    October 2007
    Location
    London Canada
    Posts
    2,886
    Blog Entries
    2
    Thanks
    1,004
    Thanked 1,213 Times in 799 Posts

    Default

    Hats off to Annie Duke, she really has done her homework and seems to know how to handle the radicals....

    "In any case, it's plain that one cannot safely draw any conclusions about the usual experience of online gamblers from the story of the minister's son who robbed a bank to support his poker habit. According to Miss Duke, the average online poker player spends about $10 a week, in exchange for which he has some fun and sharpens his skills.
    "For the majority of Americans, playing poker is a hobby," Miss Duke told the House Judiciary Committee. "They should have a right to choose how to spend their discretionary income, whether it be on poker or anything else." They do not expect to become poker champions, and they should not be treated like bank robbers."
    Terry - The Pokerkeep
    President / CEO - Gambling Affiliates Union

    Casino Affiliate Programs
    Affiliate Resources
    Gambling Affiliate Program Blacklist

    Email: admin @ thepokerkeep.com



  3. #3
    AussieDave's Avatar
    AussieDave is offline Public Member
    Join Date
    November 2005
    Location
    from the land downunder
    Posts
    3,936
    Blog Entries
    1
    Thanks
    1,576
    Thanked 1,805 Times in 1,025 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by thepokerkeep View Post
    Hats off to Annie Duke, she really has done her homework and seems to know how to handle the radicals....
    I agree...Having had a problem myself, it's not fair or just to expect others to be classed at risk, just because others may have a gambling issue.

    I can take or leave a beer, while for others, 1 is too many and 1000 is not enough. But do you see anyone passing laws to ban alcohol? They did try though and look where that ended up...

    People have choices, taking these choices away, invading people's rights or forcing bible belt doctrines on others is just plain stupid.



    Cheers



    Dave
    ---
    Compliance: a code word for control

    ---
    Do the right thing, even when no one is looking. It's called integrity.
    ---

    It's your right to be treated honestly: fairness for all igaming affiliates - doch.news

  4. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to AussieDave For This Useful Post:

    bb1web (30 November 2007), ntaus (1 December 2007)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •